1989
DOI: 10.3133/wsp2339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…aerial view in the horizontal plane), suggesting the spatial distribution and its degree of fragmentation may be more important to boundary layer dynamics than the topography itself. Our results here would support that assertion, indicating a need to better understand the role of spatial arrangement and role of 'gaps' (sensu Yager et al 1993, Duarte 2001, Granata et al 2001) in influencing nearbed hydrodynamics (which can modify bed roughness; Arcement and Schneider 1989) and its role in the generation of turbulence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…aerial view in the horizontal plane), suggesting the spatial distribution and its degree of fragmentation may be more important to boundary layer dynamics than the topography itself. Our results here would support that assertion, indicating a need to better understand the role of spatial arrangement and role of 'gaps' (sensu Yager et al 1993, Duarte 2001, Granata et al 2001) in influencing nearbed hydrodynamics (which can modify bed roughness; Arcement and Schneider 1989) and its role in the generation of turbulence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…15]. During the simulation stage, Manning's n-values were introduced according to Brunner [15] and Arcement, Schneider [9]. Since the flow condition at study river reach was nearly steady uniform, the downstream boundary condition was set at normal.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-based floodplain studies provide water surface profiles and floodplain maps for landuse planning and flood-prone areas [6][7][8]. It is import to mention that floodplain studies are complex cases where roughness coefficient should be set in part rather than one representative value for the entire river reach [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, a parameterization of rating curve was defined based on steady and uniform flow in the main channel simulation by River Analysis System developed by HEC -Hydrologic Engineering Center (BRUNNER, 2010). At each gauging station, a range of roughness coefficient was simulated, varying from 0.011 to 0.060 (ARCEMENT; SCHNEIDER, 1989;CHOW, 1959;WEBBER et al, 2018) and obtained a standard equation, it was adapted from Manning-Strickler equation:…”
Section: Reducing the Dimensionality Of Rating Curvementioning
confidence: 99%