2006
DOI: 10.3133/tm1d3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines and standard procedures for continuous water-quality monitors: Station operation, record computation, and data reporting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
190
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
190
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stream Metabolism Program imports in situ DO, water temperature, and PAR time series data and adjusts the readings such that time intervals are consistent. Temperature and DO readings are corrected for instrument fouling and drift based on pre-and postdeployment instrument calibrations (Wagner et al 2006). DO saturation concentration is calculated at each time interval from DO concentration, water temperature, and barometric pressure data.…”
Section: Stream Metabolism Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Stream Metabolism Program imports in situ DO, water temperature, and PAR time series data and adjusts the readings such that time intervals are consistent. Temperature and DO readings are corrected for instrument fouling and drift based on pre-and postdeployment instrument calibrations (Wagner et al 2006). DO saturation concentration is calculated at each time interval from DO concentration, water temperature, and barometric pressure data.…”
Section: Stream Metabolism Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barometric pressure was measured at the time the sondes were deployed and recovered. Sonde calibration and data processing were done according to the methods of Wagner et al (2006).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With guidance from USGS personnel, USFWS personnel operated the monitors on site and serviced the monitors off site (RLWD Laboratory, Thief River Falls, Minn.). Accuracy ratings for water-quality records are presented in table 18 of Wagner (2006) and are based on combined sensor fouling and calibration drift corrections applied to the record. Accuracy ratings for this study were downgraded because of protocol issues beyond the control of USGS.…”
Section: Continuous Water-quality Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four islands were selected for soil sampling based on disturbance history and accessibility: one in the Twin Cays range (East Island) and three in the Pelican Cays range (Manatee, Fisherman's, and Ridge Cays). Extent of natural and disturbed areas at each study location was estimated from satellite imagery (Landsat 7, May 2008; http://landsat.usgs.gov) and aerial photographs (April 2006(April , 2007 I. C. Feller, unpublished) and confi rmed by ground-truthing (May 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data are subjected to a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) process to remove outliers and invalid and suspect data before they are included in the historical archives. The QA/QC process also incorporates established criteria and procedures to correct for sensor and fouling drift (Wagner et al, 2006).The data have contributed to new and existing research studies, publications, and management programs for both Smithsonian researchers and an increasing number of organizations from the region (e.g., Renken and Mumby, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%