Half Diallel Analysis for Biochemical and Morphological Traits in Cultivated Eggplants (Solanum melongena L.)

Datta, Debi Rani; Rafii, Mohd Y.; Jusoh, Mashitah; Oladosu, Yusuff; Rafii, M. Y.; Jatto, Muhammed Itopa

doi:10.3390/agronomy11091769

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are many publications that reported the results of evaluation of gene action and combining ability in very different crops. For example in rice (Ambikabathy et al, 2021;Del Águila & da Silva, 2021;Gaballah et al, 2022), maize (Yu et al, 2020;Coelho, 2021;Sabitha et al, 2021), sweet corn (Khan et al, 2020), cowpea (Owusu et al, 2020), papaya (Vettorazzi et al, 2021), cotton (Giri et al, 2021;Mudhalvan et al, 2021), eggplants (Datta et al, 2021), groundnut (Daudi et al, 2021), common bean (Nkhata et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elucidation of gene action and combining ability for productive tillering in spring barley

Hudzenko

Поліщук

Лысенко

et al. 2022

Regul. Mech. Biosyst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study is to identify breeding and genetic peculiarities for productive tillering in spring barley genotypes of different origin, purposes of usage and botanical affiliation, as well as to identify effective genetic sources to further improving of the trait. There were created two complete (6 × 6) diallel crossing schemes. Into the Scheme I elite Ukrainian (MIP Tytul and Avhur) and Western European (Datcha, Quench, Gladys, and Beatrix) malting spring barley varieties were involved. Scheme II included awnless covered barley varieties Kozyr and Vitrazh bred at the Plant Production Institute named after V. Y. Yuriev of NAAS of Ukraine, naked barley varieties Condor and CDC Rattan from Canada, as well as awned feed barley variety MIP Myroslav created at MIW and malting barley variety Sebastian from Denmark. For more reliable and informative characterization of barley varieties and their progeny for productive tillering in terms of inheritance, parameters of genetic variation and general combining ability (GCA) statistical analyses of experimental data from different (2019 and 2020) growing seasons were conducted. Accordingly to the indicator of phenotypic dominance all possible modes of inheritance were detected, except for negative dominance in the Scheme I in 2020. The degree of phenotypic dominance significantly varied depending on both varieties involved in crossing schemes and conditions of the years of trials. There was overdominance in loci in both schemes in both years. The other parameters of genetic variation showed significant differences in gene action for productive tillering between crossing Schemes. In Scheme I in both years the dominance was mainly unidirectional and due to dominant effects. In the Scheme II in both years there was multidirectional dominance. In Scheme I compliance with the additive-dominant system was revealed in 2019, but in 2020 there was a strong epistasis. In Scheme II in both years non-allelic interaction was identified. In general, the mode of gene action showed a very complex gene action for productive tillering in barley and a significant role of non-genetic factors in phenotypic manifestation of the trait. Despite this, the level of heritability in the narrow sense in both Schemes pointed to the possibility of the successful selection of individuals with genetically determined increased productive tillering in the splitting generations. In Scheme I the final selection for productive tillering will be more effective in later generations, when dominant alleles become homozygous. In Scheme II it is theoretically possible to select plants with high productive tillering on both recessive and dominant basis. In both schemes the non-allelic interaction should be taken into consideration. Spring barley varieties Beatrix, Datcha, MIP Myroslav and Kozyr can be used as effective genetic sources for involvement in crossings aimed at improving the productive tillering. The results of present study contribute to further development of studies devoted to evaluation of gene action for yield-related traits in spring barley, as well as identification of new genetic sources for plant improvement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elucidation of gene action and combining ability for productive tillering in spring barley

Hudzenko

Поліщук

Лысенко

et al. 2022

Regul. Mech. Biosyst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This can be in the form of dominance, over-dominance, and epistatic gene action (Acquaah 2012;Nugraha et al 2016). According to Marwiyah et al (2019), Dianga et al (2020), and Datta et al (2021), the determination of gene action can be carried out by ratios or comparisons of additive and dominant diversity. A ratio of more than 1 indicates that the character is more dominated by additive gene action while a ratio of less than 1 shows that it is influenced by the dominant gene action.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Half Diallelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is closely related to the pattern of gene action; therefore, it is divided into two types, namely GCA and SCA (Pandiarana et al 2015;Ghareeb and Fares 2016;Kaushik and Dhaliwal 2018;Farooq et al 2019;Vijeth et al 2019). GCA is identical abilities for additive gene action, therefore, genotypes with high GCA tend to produce good progeny vigor after being crossed (Olfati et al 2012;Pandiarana et al 2015;Ene et al 2018;Murtadha et al 2018;Zongo et al 2019;Boyaci et al 2020;Dianga et al 2020;Datta et al 2021). This means that the development of this variety can be directed into pure-line or composite varieties and the formation of hybrids (Bahari et al 2012;Bouchetat andAissat 2019, Marwiyah et al 2019).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Half Diallelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, diallel crosses do not necessarily involve all possible combinations (full diallel). Some studies also use the concept of half diallel because it involves the use of several combinations of pure line parents in the absence of their reciprocals (Olfati et al 2012;Ene et al 2018;Boyaci et al 2020;Dianga et al 2020;Datta et al 2021). Although this combination is not as much as in full diallel crosses, this method is quite effective for a small number of parents and focuses on the nature of cross interactions that do not involve maternal effects (Singh and Chaudhary 1979;Olfati et al 2012;Datta et al 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Half diallel of F1 tomato hybrid and its double cross-compatibility

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Farid M, Anhsori MF, Ridwan I, Dungga NE, Ermiyanti I. 2022. Half diallel of F1 tomato hybrid and its double cross-compatibility. Biodiversitas 23: 1813-1821. Breeding program for improvement of tomato fruit can be done through diallelic crosses genetic combinations. Therefore, genetic evaluation is needed to meet the breeding objective. This process can be combined with crosses between F1 to produce high diversity. However, evaluating the crosses' compatibility is required to increase the effectiveness of the assembly process. This study aimedto assess the half-diallel crosses of F1 tomatoes in the field and determine the most compatible pair cross combinationsin forming double and three-way F1 populations. This study was carried out in the Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University. The field evaluation was arranged ina randomized complete block design with ten genotypes, while the compatibility evaluationwas carried out using 6 F1 half diallel as the parents. The results showed that the Mawar and Chung varieties were better parents in the crossings. Furthermore, the results showed that F1 K/M (the best yield component), M/C (the best TDS and Lycopene traits), and BC/K (the genotype has good traits of yield component, TDS and Lycopene) were the best single F1 crosses that could be inherited to the F2 generation. In contrast, F1 K/M and F1 K/C crosses were the best male and female parents, respectively. The recommended double-crosses include K/C//BC/M, and BC/C//K/M, while for the F1 unbalanced three-way cross was K/C//K/M.

show abstract

“…Tripathy et al, (2020) conducted experiment on brinjal and recorded the maximum height of plant was 161.44 cm in Utkal Jyoti variety. Datta et al, (2023) did experiment on brinjal and concluded that the maximum height of plant was 87.83 cm recorded compared to other varieties. Alam et al, (2021) conducted experiment on brinjal and reported the plant height was 76.12 cm all among the other varieties.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Evaluation of Different Varieties of Brinjal (Solanum Melongena L.) for Growth and Yield Parameters

Bhuvaneswari,

Keerthi,

Ramesh

et al. 2023

J. Adv. Zool.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brinjal, (Solanum melongena) is also known as eggplant or aubergine is an important vegetable crop cultivated worldwide belonging to the family Solanaceae. Brinjal is a diploid with chromosome number 2n=24=2x. Centre of origin for Brinjal is India. Brinjal has a great genetic variability so the importance of selecting brinjal varieties and genotypes that are well suited to local geographical conditions to maximize the growth and yield. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of previous research findings concerning about the evaluation of different brinjal varieties and genotypes concerning their growth, yield potential and morphological characteristics. The main objective of this review is to understand the importance of selecting the most suitable varieties and genotypes to improve the production and quality and to estimate the key parameters, including plant height, leaf and flower characteristics, fruit weight, shape, size and yield

show abstract

Half Diallel Analysis for Biochemical and Morphological Traits in Cultivated Eggplants (Solanum melongena L.)

Cited by 8 publications

References 35 publications

Elucidation of gene action and combining ability for productive tillering in spring barley

Elucidation of gene action and combining ability for productive tillering in spring barley

Half diallel of F1 tomato hybrid and its double cross-compatibility

Evaluation of Different Varieties of Brinjal (Solanum Melongena L.) for Growth and Yield Parameters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About