2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2003.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half-life data—a critical review of TECDOC-619 update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…half lives of shortlived radionuclides, are periodically re-examined and updated (e.g. Woods and Collins, 2004). An essential aspect of the re-examination, in addition to the purely mathematical/statistical consistency (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…half lives of shortlived radionuclides, are periodically re-examined and updated (e.g. Woods and Collins, 2004). An essential aspect of the re-examination, in addition to the purely mathematical/statistical consistency (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper estimations of uncertainties need to be performed to produce a consistent set of published data (Woods and Collins, 2004). It is the opinion of the authors that it is justified to increase the uncertainty of the half-life reported by Jordan and Blanke (1967) to cover the discrepancy in their data; the adjusted half-life is 18.718 (18) days.…”
Section: Jordan and Blanke (1967)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By contrast, calibration with alanine against the national standard sources requires only two corrections: one for 60 Co decay with a precisely known half-life of 1925.23 days (Nagy, Puhl, et al 2000) and another for differences between the mass energy absorption coefficients for water and soft tissue, which is small (<1%) and reasonably well-known (Woods, et al 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%