Halitosis de origen periodontal: revisión

Colla, M. Menéndez; Rodríguez, B. Noguerol; Frechoso, Susana Cuesta; Pérez, M. Gallego; Lobo, José M. Tejerina; Felechosa, Alberto Sicilia

doi:10.4321/s1699-65852004000100003

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

(92 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several authors have mentioned the relevance of evaluating these biomarkers in patients with periodontitis due to the alteration that occurs in their levels as the inflammatory process characteristic of periodontitis increases [23]. On the other hand, it has been suggested that volatile compounds such as ammonium, produced by bacterial metabolism, may be found to be increased in patients with periodontal pockets [24], likewise, the presence of blood may be associated with ulcerations of the gingival sulcus epithelium [25]. In this study, ammonium had to be excluded due to errors in the test strips of the first batch used, so this comparison was not made, but the literature recognizes the importance of the information that this biomarker could provide for the prediction of response to periodontal treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Salivary Biomarkers and their Relationship with Periodontal Clinical Parameters: A Cross-Sectional Study

Marin,

Duque,

Cardona

et al. 2023

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Traditionally, periodontal clinical parameters are used to diagnose and design standardized treatment plans. The scientific literature has not widely reported the inclusion of salivary biomarkers in this diagnostic and therapeutic process. Objectives: To analyze the correlation between salivary biomarkers and periodontal clinical parameters of a group of patients undergoing the periodontal maintenance phase in a private dental office located in the southwest of Colombia. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. A sample of 92 patients undergoing the periodontal maintenance phase was analyzed. Conventional periodontal parameters were determined, and salivary biomarkers were measured by chromatography (cariogenic bacteria, acidity, buffering capacity, blood, and erythrocytes). To determine its correlation, a bivariate statistical analysis was developed. Results: According to Spearman's correlation matrix, among the periodontal clinical parameters, there were statistically significant correlations between the extension and severity of the complete and proximal attachment loss (r=0.93) and between the bleeding on probing (BOP) and the plaque index (PI) (r= 0.37). Within the salivary biomarkers, a statistically significant correlation was found between acidity and the buffering capacity of saliva (r= -0.54); between buffering capacity and proteins (r=0.36); between blood and erythrocytes (r=0.42); between blood and proteins (r=0.58), and between erythrocytes and proteins (r=0.48). Finally, a statistically significant correlation between periodontal parameters and salivary biomarkers was observed between teeth lost due to periodontal disease and acidity (r=0.26) and between teeth lost and buffer capacity (r=0.30). Conclusion: Periodontal parameters and salivary biomarkers correlate with variables of the same group to which they belong. Still, only the variable teeth lost due to periodontal disease correlates with acidity and buffer capacity. The findings suggest that both periodontal parameters and salivary biomarkers should be evaluated throughout the periodontal process. It is possible that both parameters could express different moments of the pathophysiology of the disease.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%