1829
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.129754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbuch zur Erkennung der nutzbarsten und am häufigsten vorkommenden Gewächse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as 1794 Moench recognised morphological differences within Phlomis that he believed to be characteristic enough to split the taxon into two separate genera, Phlomis and Phlomoides Moench (Moench 1794). These morphological differences have also been recognised by many other authors (Link 1829;Bentham 1832Bentham -1836Boissier 1879;Briquet 1897;Kamelin & Makhmedov 1990a, b), who have either treated the two groups as different genera or as different sections within the same genus (for an overview of the classification history, see Table 1 and Ryding 2008). These two groups will be referred to as the Phlomis group and the Phlomoides group in the following, whereas the genus Phlomis as traditionally circumscribed will be referred to as Phlomis sensu lato (s.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As early as 1794 Moench recognised morphological differences within Phlomis that he believed to be characteristic enough to split the taxon into two separate genera, Phlomis and Phlomoides Moench (Moench 1794). These morphological differences have also been recognised by many other authors (Link 1829;Bentham 1832Bentham -1836Boissier 1879;Briquet 1897;Kamelin & Makhmedov 1990a, b), who have either treated the two groups as different genera or as different sections within the same genus (for an overview of the classification history, see Table 1 and Ryding 2008). These two groups will be referred to as the Phlomis group and the Phlomoides group in the following, whereas the genus Phlomis as traditionally circumscribed will be referred to as Phlomis sensu lato (s.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because they produce aerial spore-bearing structures that resemble those of certain fungi and also typically occur in some of the same types of ecological situations as fungi, myxomycetes have been traditionally studied by mycologists (Martin and Alexopoulos 1969). Indeed, the name most closely associated with the group, first used by Link (1833) more than 175 years ago, is derived from the words "myxa" (which means slime) and "mycetes" (referring to fungi).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linnaeus followed the same generic name Clavaria and mentioned few Cordyceps species in his great work Species Plantarum (Linnaeus, 1753). Since then, it has attracted attention of great mycologists such as Persoon (1799), Fries (1823), Link (1833), Berkeley (1843), Tulasne Brothers (1865), Saccardo (1883) and Massee (1895) and was described under different generic names. Old literature proposed different generic names for Cordyceps such as Clavaria , Sphaeria and Torrubia , before Link (1833) finally erected Cordyceps as a new generic name.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, it has attracted attention of great mycologists such as Persoon (1799), Fries (1823), Link (1833), Berkeley (1843), Tulasne Brothers (1865), Saccardo (1883) and Massee (1895) and was described under different generic names. Old literature proposed different generic names for Cordyceps such as Clavaria , Sphaeria and Torrubia , before Link (1833) finally erected Cordyceps as a new generic name. During last hundred years or more, regional exploration of Cordyceps species continued in many parts of the world such as Australia (Olliff, 1895; Willis, 1959), North America (Seaver, 1911; Mains, 1958), New Zealand (Dingley, 1953), Ceylon (present day Sri Lanka) (Petch, 1924), Great Britain (Petch, 1932, 1948), Japan (Kobayasi, 1939a, b, 1941; Kobayasi and Shimizu, 1983), Congo (Moureau, 1962), Norway (Eckblad, 1967), Ghana (Samson et al, 1982), Taiwan (Tzean et al, 1997), Amazonia (Evans and Samson, 1982, 1984; Samson and Evans, 1985), Thailand (Hywel-Jones 1994, 1995a, b, c, 1996; Hywel-Jones and Sivichai, 1995), Korea (Sung, 1996), China (Zang and Kinjo, 1998), and Mexico (Guzman et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%