2022
DOI: 10.4250/jcvi.2020.0241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handheld Echocardiography in a Clinical Practice Scenario: Concordances Compared to Standard Echocardiographic Reports

Abstract: BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of a handheld device (HH) used during common daily practice and its agreement with the results of a standard echocardiography study (STD) performed by experienced sonographers and echocardiographer. METHODS A prospective follow-up was conducted in an adult outpatient echocardiography clinic. Experienced sonographers performed the STD and an experienced echocardiographer performed the HH. STD included 2-dimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound is a complex imaging modality, and image capturing and image interpretation require training [18,19], but there are still no standardized approaches regarding the content of training programs, their duration, or required trainer qualifications [20]. Considering that ultrasound examinations are user-dependent, the results reported in the scientific literature support the accuracy in measurements and lower image quality when compared to conventional US cardiac examinations [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound is a complex imaging modality, and image capturing and image interpretation require training [18,19], but there are still no standardized approaches regarding the content of training programs, their duration, or required trainer qualifications [20]. Considering that ultrasound examinations are user-dependent, the results reported in the scientific literature support the accuracy in measurements and lower image quality when compared to conventional US cardiac examinations [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%