MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2008.4753321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonised resilience, security and mobility capability for IP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the term Identifier-Locator Network Protocol for IPv6 (ILNPv6) to refer to our proposal, as it can be engineered as enhancements to IPv6 [1], [4].…”
Section: Overview Of Ilnpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We use the term Identifier-Locator Network Protocol for IPv6 (ILNPv6) to refer to our proposal, as it can be engineered as enhancements to IPv6 [1], [4].…”
Section: Overview Of Ilnpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, a local (private) Locator value, L L , is used by all nodes in the mobile network, and for all egress packets, the MR rewrites L L to either L 1 or L 2 depending on the egress links to be used, and performs the complimentary operation for ingress packets. This is the ILNPv6 equivalent of NAT, but unlike IP, does not violate end-to-end state and is completely transparent to all ILNPv6 nodes [1]. Now, let us assume a handover is triggered for the link currently using L 1 .…”
Section: Mobile Network With Ilnpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations