2001
DOI: 10.1080/14616700120098924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hazel and the "Hacksaw": Freedom Summer coverage by the women of the Mississippi Press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since its conceptualization in 1972, agenda setting has remained a frequently employed media-effects-based theory. Researchers have employed agenda setting as the theoretical framework to examine political coverage (e.g., Ragas & Kiousis, 2010;Wirth et al, 2010) and social issues, such as criminal activity and human rights (e.g., Holbrook & Hill, 2005;Park, Zhang, & Holody, 2012;Weill, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its conceptualization in 1972, agenda setting has remained a frequently employed media-effects-based theory. Researchers have employed agenda setting as the theoretical framework to examine political coverage (e.g., Ragas & Kiousis, 2010;Wirth et al, 2010) and social issues, such as criminal activity and human rights (e.g., Holbrook & Hill, 2005;Park, Zhang, & Holody, 2012;Weill, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though not usually documented, this rejection of inter-ethnic coverage is often based on fear of consequences. Previous studies of the mainstream press in the American South found similar dilemmas for White editors who empathized with the struggles of Blacks but who rejected coverage of the African-American struggle for civil rights after threats of economic and social reprisal (e.g., Ames, 1938, Davies, 2001, Weill, 2001, 2002.…”
Section: Empathetic Rejectionismmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similar reticence to provide coverage of the struggles of AfricanAmericans was found among editors of the White press in the American South during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Though several White editors empathized with the struggles of Blacks, they feared community disapproval and withdrawal of advertising revenue and thus rarely voiced support for African-Americans in their newspapers (e.g., Ames, 1938;Cooper, 2001;Davies, 2001;Weill, 2001). The editors were susceptible to the opinions and pressures directed at them by their advertisers and their subscribers (Ghiglione, 1978;Gilmore and Root, 1978).…”
Section: Agenda-setting Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A widely utilized media effects theory, agenda setting has been employed to examine media effects found in traditional forms of media such as print and television relating to political campaigns (e.g., Boyle, 2001;Dunn, 2009;Peake & Eshbaugh-Soha, 2008;Ragas & Kiousis, 2010;Roberts & McCombs, 1994;Shehata, 2010;Wirth et al, 2010) and various issues such as civil rights (e.g., Weill, 2001;Winter & Eyal, 1981) and crime (e.g., Gross & Aday, 2003;Holbrook & Hill, 2005;Lowry, Nio, & Leitner, 2003;Park, Zhang, & Holody, 2012). As highlighted by Weaver (2007), ''agenda setting is focused on the relative salience (usually operationally defined as perceived importance) of issues or subjects .…”
Section: Agenda Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%