Health Administration for What?

Beauchamp, Dan E.; Freidson, Eliot; Donabedian, Avedis; Hanlon, John J.; Levey, Samuel; Loomba, N. Paul; Arnold, Mary F.; Blankenship, Lee; Hess, John M.

doi:10.2307/974545

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Rationale For Governmental Intervention1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1990

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The point of departure for our model is the premise that well-informed adults should have the right to engage in behaviors of their choosing so long as their actions do not impose harms or costs on others. Many leading theorists would reject this premise, particularly those who define society in communitarian rather than individualistic terms (Beauchamp, 1975;Bellah, et al, 1985;Herzog, 1987;Walzer, 1983). We adopt it here because it reflects what we interpret to be the dominant ethic of contemporary Western society and it exerts significant influence in Western policy legitimation and fonnation.…”

Section: Rationale For Governmental Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Licit and illicit drug policies: a typology

Warner

Citrin²,

Pickett

et al. 1990

British Journal of Addiction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To foster comparison of policy interventions across the various categories of licit and illicit drugs, we develop a typology of policies intended to address drug abuse problems. The principal dimensions of the typology are policy type and intervention channel. While the typology has important limitations, as a mechanism to organize information and stimulate thought it holds the potential to improve understanding of commonalities and distinctions among policies applying to widely discrepant drug problems, both within and across cultures. As such, it could contribute to the development of more effective approaches to grappling with a diverse set of drug policy issues.

show abstract

Section: Rationale For Governmental Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%