Heart rate response and technical demands of different small-sided game formats in young female basketballers. [Respuesta de la frecuencia cardíaca y demanda técnica en diferentes formatos de juegos reducidos realizados por jugadoras jóvenes de baloncesto].

Sánchez-Sánchez, Javier; Carretero, Mario; Valiente, Jorge; Gonzalo-Skok, Óliver; Sampaio, Jaime; Casamichana, David

doi:10.5232/ricyde2018.05105

Cited by 8 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As regards IL, RPE (21,33,51,52,58,78,91,95,96) and sRPE (21,33,51,96) are again the metrics used most frequently when it comes to young basketball players. The quantitative questionnaires most commonly used in this type of population are Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) (5), TQR (21,95), POMS (58), Wellness, and the Postgame Subjective Performance Evaluation (95).…”

Section: Subelitementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lactate (91) and saliva (58) have also been analyzed in young players, and this information confirms that training programs can be individualized to facilitate better adaptation to training loads. The following expressions of the HR have been used for young players: SHRZ (42,51,52,73), HR (73,91,96), TRIMPs and Lucia TRIMP (83), HRavg, HRmax, %HRmax (73) and HRpeak, HRmean, %HRmax, Z4, and Z5 (78). Maximal intensity (session duration at 90-100% HRmax) has also been analyzed to find out how much time is spent at high levels during competition so as to be able to adapt it to training (52).…”

Section: Subelitementioning

confidence: 99%

“…With a counter-movement jump (CMJ) using contact mats, we can detect our players' neuromuscular fatigue and find out how ready they are to begin the session and also discover the differences at the end of the session (5,19,21,31,46,59). In addition, video cameras (10,42,67,78) and video analysis software such as Kinovea (10) and Match Vision (78) have been used.…”

Section: Technological Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To evaluate performance in basketball, the measure most commonly used in the literature is the CMJ as a jump test (5,20,21,36,61,81) and the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery test level 1 (YO-YO IR1) as an aerobic test (4,13,58,78,80,81). The squat jump (SJ) (4,66) and the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery test level 2 (YO-YO IR2) (55,66) have been used to a lesser extent.…”

Section: Performance and Injury Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, we found other articles whose data were obtained through optical player tracking systems (18), the ADXL326 accelerometer (98), the X8-Mini accelerometer (88), and the VERT accelerometer (33). On the other hand, for monitoring IL we found practical evidence obtained using HR sensors such as GarminTM (73,76), Suunto Memory Belts (10,96), Polar H7 (51,52,80), Polar T31 (25,84), and other models from Polar Team Solutions (65,78). Lactate analyzers (83,91) and Omegawave technology (36) have also been used.…”

Section: Data Recordingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Monitoring Training Loads in Basketball: A Narrative Review and Practical Guide for Coaches and Practitioners

Piedra

Peña

Caparrós

2021

Strength &Amp; Conditioning Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring training load provides information about the physical demands of the sport in which athletes are competing. Strength and conditioning coaches need to use this information to periodize and make decisions on training to optimize performance and prevent injuries. The following narrative review presents the current state of knowledge on monitoring external and internal loads in basketball. The reviewed articles were classified according to the sample represented, considering 3 groups: elite, subelite, and young basketball players. In addition, we analyzed the recording procedures and methodology used in technological and ecological terms. Articles were classified, considering what was monitored and the context in which it was monitored. These settings included competition, training, and small-sided games. Performance and sports injury variables were also taken into account in our review.

show abstract

Section: Subelitementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Subelitementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Technological Monitoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Performance and Injury Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Recordingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Monitoring Training Loads in Basketball: A Narrative Review and Practical Guide for Coaches and Practitioners

Piedra

Peña

Caparrós

2021

Strength &Amp; Conditioning Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Measuring Physical Demands in Basketball: An Explorative Systematic Review of Practices

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Measuring the physical work and resultant acute psychobiological responses of basketball can help to better understand and inform physical preparation models and improve overall athlete health and performance. Recent advancements in training load monitoring solutions have coincided with increases in the literature describing the physical demands of basketball, but there are currently no reviews that summarize all the available basketball research. Additionally, a thorough appraisal of the load monitoring methodologies and measures used in basketball is lacking in the current literature. This type of critical analysis would allow for consistent comparison between studies to better understand physical demands across the sport. Objectives The objective of this systematic review was to assess and critically evaluate the methods and technologies used for monitoring physical demands in competitive basketball athletes. We used the term 'training load' to encompass the physical demands of both training and game activities, with the latter assumed to provide a training stimulus as well. This review aimed to critique methodological inconsistencies, establish operational definitions specific to the sport, and make recommendations for basketball training load monitoring practice and reporting within the literature. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed using EBSCO, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science to identify studies through March 2020. Electronic databases were searched using terms related to basketball and training load. Records were included if they used a competitive basketball population and incorporated a measure of training load. This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO Registration # CRD42019123603), and approved under the National Basketball Association (NBA) Health Related Research Policy. Results Electronic and manual searches identified 122 papers that met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported the physical demands of basketball during training (n = 56), competition (n = 36), and both training and competition (n = 30). Physical demands were quantified with a measure of internal training load (n = 52), external training load (n = 29), or both internal and external measures (n = 41). These studies examined males (n = 76), females (n = 34), both male and female (n = 9), and a combination of youth (i.e. under 18 years, n = 37), adults (i.e. 18 years or older, n = 77), and both adults and youth (n = 4). Inconsistencies related to the reporting of competition level, methodology for recording duration, participant inclusion criteria, and validity of measurement systems were identified as key factors relating to the reporting of physical demands in basketball and summarized for each study. Conclusions This review comprehensively evaluated the current body of literature related to training load monitoring in basketball. Within this literature, there is a clear lack of alignment in applied practices and metho...

show abstract

Defensive Strategy and Player Sex Impact Heart-Rate Responses During Games-Based Drills in Professional Basketball

Suárez-Iglesias¹,

Dehesa²,

Scanlan³

et al. 2021

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Games-based drills (GBD) are the predominant form of training stimulus prescribed to male and female basketball players. Despite being readily manipulated during GBD, the impact of defensive strategy on the sex-specific demands of GBD remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify and compare the heart-rate (HR) responses experienced during 5v5 GBD using different defensive strategies (man-to-man defense vs zone defense [ZD] formations) according to player sex. Method: HR was recorded in 11 professional male and 10 professional female basketball players while performing 5v5 GBD with different defensive strategies (man-to-man defense or ZD). HR-based training load was also calculated using the summated heart-rate zones model. Results: During man-to-man defense, mean HR (), relative time (in percentage) spent working at 90% to 100% maximal HR (), and summated heart-rate zones () were greater (P < .05) in female players compared with males. During ZD, higher (P < .01) peak HR (), mean HR (), relative and absolute (in minutes) time spent working at 80% to 89% maximal HR ( and .03, respectively) and 90% to 100% maximal HR ( and .09, respectively), and summated heart-rate zones () were observed in female players compared with males. Conclusions: The defensive strategy employed during 5v5 full-court GBD influences HR responses and training load differently according to sex, where female players experience higher HR responses than males, especially when ZD are adopted. Basketball coaching staff can use these findings for the precise manipulation of team defenses during GBD to elicit desired cardiovascular stress on players.

show abstract

Heart rate response and technical demands of different small-sided game formats in young female basketballers. [Respuesta de la frecuencia cardíaca y demanda técnica en diferentes formatos de juegos reducidos realizados por jugadoras jóvenes de baloncesto].

Cited by 8 publications

References 30 publications

Monitoring Training Loads in Basketball: A Narrative Review and Practical Guide for Coaches and Practitioners

Monitoring Training Loads in Basketball: A Narrative Review and Practical Guide for Coaches and Practitioners

Measuring Physical Demands in Basketball: An Explorative Systematic Review of Practices

Defensive Strategy and Player Sex Impact Heart-Rate Responses During Games-Based Drills in Professional Basketball

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About