2009
DOI: 10.3952/lithjphys.49110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy hadron spectroscopy and the bag model

Abstract: Some time ago a slightly improved variant of bag model (the modified bag model) suitable for the unified description of light and heavy hadrons was developed. The main goal of the present work was to calculate the masses of the ground state baryons containing bottom quarks in the framework of this model. For completeness the predictions for other heavy hadrons are also given. The reasonable agreement of our results with other theoretical calculations and available experimental data suggests that our prediction… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
7
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our prediction for the Ξ 0− b -Ξ − b transition is very close to the results of [18] and [21], but considerably different from that of [20]. As far as the Ξ 00 c -Ξ 0 c transition is concerned, our result confirms the prediction of [19]-it is approximately 1.5 times smaller than that of [22], two times Q -Ξ 0 Q transition magnetic moments predicted by the light cone QCD sum rules (our result), effective quark mass scheme [18,19], screened quark charge scheme [18,19], bag model [20], nonrelativistic quark model [21], and chiral constituent quark model [22] approaches in units of nuclear magneton μ N . The first (second) column of [18] ( [19]) corresponds the effective quark mass (screened quark charge) scheme.…”
Section: Numerical Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our prediction for the Ξ 0− b -Ξ − b transition is very close to the results of [18] and [21], but considerably different from that of [20]. As far as the Ξ 00 c -Ξ 0 c transition is concerned, our result confirms the prediction of [19]-it is approximately 1.5 times smaller than that of [22], two times Q -Ξ 0 Q transition magnetic moments predicted by the light cone QCD sum rules (our result), effective quark mass scheme [18,19], screened quark charge scheme [18,19], bag model [20], nonrelativistic quark model [21], and chiral constituent quark model [22] approaches in units of nuclear magneton μ N . The first (second) column of [18] ( [19]) corresponds the effective quark mass (screened quark charge) scheme.…”
Section: Numerical Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The first (second) column of [18] ( [19]) corresponds the effective quark mass (screened quark charge) scheme. larger than that of [21] and 10 times larger than the results predicted in [20]. Finally, we express our concluding remarks about the present work, in which we calculate the magnetic moments of the Ξ 00 Q -Ξ 0 Q (Q ¼ b or c) transitions within the framework of light cone QCD sum rules.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic moments of the ground state J P = 1 2 + heavy baryons have widely been studied in literature. Furthermore, magnetic moments of the heavy baryons have been investigated in the naive quark model in [8,9], phenomenological quark model [10], relativistic three-quark model [11], variational approach [12], nonrelativistic quark model with screening and effective quark mass [13,14], nonrelativistic hypercentral model [15], chiral constituent quark model [16], chiral bag model [17], chiral perturbation theory [18], traditional QCD sum rules [19], and light cone QCD sum rules (LCSR) [20][21][22], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] employs QCD sum rules and Ref. [11] uses a bag model. There are a few calculations that predict the Σ c (2455) natural width in the region of 1-3 MeV/c 2 [12][13][14][15][16][17] and the Σ c (2520) width to be about 18 MeV/c 2 [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%