2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-ion induced chromosomal aberrations: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 For hadrontherapy, comparison of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients treated either with C-ions or X-rays for similar tumours generally shows a higher damage after conventional radiotherapy compared with heavy ion treatment, both for passive modulation 109 and active raster scanning. 110 These results, apparently in contradiction with the increased effectiveness of heavy ions in the induction of chromosomal aberrations, 111 are caused by the different treatment planning. With heavy ions, the integral dose is reduced because, thanks to the Bragg peak, only a few fields (1-3) at different angles are used compared with conformal and intensitymodulated therapy with X-rays (up to 9-10 fields).…”
Section: Late Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15 For hadrontherapy, comparison of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients treated either with C-ions or X-rays for similar tumours generally shows a higher damage after conventional radiotherapy compared with heavy ion treatment, both for passive modulation 109 and active raster scanning. 110 These results, apparently in contradiction with the increased effectiveness of heavy ions in the induction of chromosomal aberrations, 111 are caused by the different treatment planning. With heavy ions, the integral dose is reduced because, thanks to the Bragg peak, only a few fields (1-3) at different angles are used compared with conformal and intensitymodulated therapy with X-rays (up to 9-10 fields).…”
Section: Late Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In other words, it takes 40 times more dose of X-rays to lead to the same tumor incidence than with HZE Fe. In contrast, in vitro studies for mammalian cell survival have led to much lower RBE with values ~2 for primary human breast epithelial cell survival exposed to 1 GeV/n Fe [4] or between 2 to 10 for chromosomal aberrations for various HZE [5]. There are therefore discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo responses, and mechanistic models may help resolve such discrepancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In plants, the biological effects of heavy-ion radiation encompassed a wide range of alterations, including developmental abnormalities (Kranz, 1994), chromosomal aberrations (Ritter & Durante, 2010;Kikuchi et al, 2009;Wei et al, 2006) and increased mutation rates (Du et al, 2014). Heavy-ion radiation-induced variations have also been found in the plant genome (Xu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%