2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2018.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic Pump-Patient Interactions and Left Ventricular Assist Device Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, these devices are preload-dependent and afterload-sensitive. These differences, coupled with ventricular and aortic loading conditions, contribute to the complex dynamics between the physiological response of the patient and the device itself [13].…”
Section: The Evolution Of Device Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, these devices are preload-dependent and afterload-sensitive. These differences, coupled with ventricular and aortic loading conditions, contribute to the complex dynamics between the physiological response of the patient and the device itself [13].…”
Section: The Evolution Of Device Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data have shown that newer-generation data have different hemodynamic pump-patient interactions; in particular, intrapericardial pumps such as the HeartWare device result in a more global than longitudinal change on echocardiogram. 4 Given these differences, how would the authors address the criteria for explantation if echocardiogram parameters such as left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter may not be applicable?…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Stepwise increase in speed at intervals of 400 RPM for HeartMate II and 100 RPM for HVAD are then made; other protocols have shown 130-RPM intervals in the HVAD physiologically correlates with 400-RPM intervals in the HeartMate II 53)54)…”
Section: Complications Of Lvadsmentioning
confidence: 99%