2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-015-9210-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis E Virus in Domestic Pigs, Wild Boars, Pig Farm Workers, and Hunters in Estonia

Abstract: While hepatitis E is a growing health concern in Europe, epidemiological data on hepatitis E virus (HEV) in Estonia are scarce. Along with imported HEV infections, autochthonous cases are reported from European countries. Both domestic and wild animals can be a source of human cases of this zoonosis. Here, we investigated the presence of anti-HEV antibodies and HEV RNA in domestic pigs and wild boars, as well as in pig farm workers and hunters in Estonia. Anti-HEV antibodies were detected in 234/380 (61.6 %) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with various previous studies [14,15,34,35,49,[52][53][54][55][56][57], while a few authors did not find evidence for such an association [58][59][60]. Based on the tendencies found in our study (HEV IgG prevalence, serological evidence of (post)acute HEV infection) and the support from literature [38], we hypothesize that professional exposure to domestic pigs is a stronger risk factor than having occasional contact to wild boar when hunting. This can be explained by the remarkably high circulation of HEV in domestic pigs [54,[61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in line with various previous studies [14,15,34,35,49,[52][53][54][55][56][57], while a few authors did not find evidence for such an association [58][59][60]. Based on the tendencies found in our study (HEV IgG prevalence, serological evidence of (post)acute HEV infection) and the support from literature [38], we hypothesize that professional exposure to domestic pigs is a stronger risk factor than having occasional contact to wild boar when hunting. This can be explained by the remarkably high circulation of HEV in domestic pigs [54,[61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In humans, seroprevalence in the general population (blood donors) in Europe ranged from 0.6 to 52.5% [32]. Higher prevalence estimates were demonstrated for professional risk groups with direct contact to domestic pigs as well as for hunters and forestry workers [33][34][35][36][37][38]. A protective effect of wearing gloves during disembowelling [31] provides indirect evidence for the risk of exposure due to direct contact with wild boar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the time the animals are transferred to the research campus, most no longer are viremic or shedding the virus, and with good workplace practices, transmission to persons with pig contact will be low. Individuals with close contact to the pigs, such as veterinarians and farm workers, or to pig blood, such as slaughter-house workers and hunters, have been found to have higher rates of anti-HEV than the general population and suggest that close contact with pigs or wild boar is a risk factor for acquiring HEV (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a study from the UK indicated that 92.8% of 640 pigs sampled at slaughter were seropositive to HEV (Tedder 2014). Approximately 62% and 73% of serum from domestic pigs were positive for anti-HEV IgG antibodies in Estonia (Ivanova et al 2015) and Denmark (Kaba et al 2013), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%