Herbal Treatment Modality for Management of Leukoplakia - A Systematic Review

Chandak, Rakhi; Lohe, Vidya K; Chandak, Manoj; Bhowate, Rahul; Sathawane, Ramhari; Gaikwad, Romita; Talatule, Dhiran; Bansod, Runal; Thakare, Pranali

doi:10.31782/ijcrr.2021.13110

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The clinical parameters will be measured for evaluation of the results are the PPD, RAL, [22] RGML, RD, WKG and GT which will be recorded using a UNC-15 probe. To assimilate the clinical parameters, acrylic stents will be made on patient's casts.…”

Section: Probing Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) Membrane and Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) Membrane using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Approach Technique for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects in Humans – A Study Protocol

Hassan

Dhadse

2021

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) membrane and Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) membrane using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Approach method for the management of multiple gingival recession (GR) defects in humans. Methodology: 20 subjects with gingival recession will be enrolled. 10 patient will be randomly allotted to test group (PRFM membrane) or control group (PRF membrame). Primary outcome will be gain in root coverage (RC) and secondary outcome will be Plaque index (PI), Papillary bleeding index (PBI), probing pocket depth (PPD), relative attachment level (RAL), relative gingival margin level (RGML), recession depth (RD), gingival thickness (GT) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG). Clinical evaluation will be performed at 3 & 6 months of therapy. Expected Results: When all the parameters will be compared at 6 months post-operatively to baseline data, both the treatment group (test and control) will be expected to show significant gain in RC, RAL gain, PPD reduction, decrease in RD, increase in GT and WKG. PRFM membrane will result in significant gain in RC, RAL gain, PPD reduction, and decrease in reduction depth, increase in GT and WKG at 6 months when compared to PRF membrane. Conclusion: PRFM membrane will be effectual in management of gingival recession. PRFM membrane is expected to have significantly greater outcome as compared to PRF membrane group.

show abstract

Section: Probing Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%