2003
DOI: 10.1076/orbi.22.4.239.17245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hertel exophthalmometry: Reliability and interobserver variation

Abstract: Hertel exophthalmometry is a reliable method for measuring the ocular protrusion. However, as with most clinical measures, there is a negligible interobserver variation that seems to be unavoidable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…20 If the upper normal limit was defined as 2 standard deviations above the mean, the upper limit of normal Chinese in our study was 18.6 mm, which was lower than 21 mm that has traditionally been considered for Caucasians. Migliori and Gladstone 4 reported the upper limit of normal value was 20.1 mm for white women, 21.7 mm for white men, 23.0 mm for black women, and 24.7 mm for black men, which all were so different from what has been reported of the others 17.7 mm for the Japanese, 20 18.3 mm for Koreans, 19 19.3 mm for Iranians, 21 and 18.6 mm for the present study. The clinical significance is that an Asian patient with exophthalmometric reading within the upper normal limit of Caucasian measurements may consider advanced study to exclude TAO or other cause of exophthalmos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…20 If the upper normal limit was defined as 2 standard deviations above the mean, the upper limit of normal Chinese in our study was 18.6 mm, which was lower than 21 mm that has traditionally been considered for Caucasians. Migliori and Gladstone 4 reported the upper limit of normal value was 20.1 mm for white women, 21.7 mm for white men, 23.0 mm for black women, and 24.7 mm for black men, which all were so different from what has been reported of the others 17.7 mm for the Japanese, 20 18.3 mm for Koreans, 19 19.3 mm for Iranians, 21 and 18.6 mm for the present study. The clinical significance is that an Asian patient with exophthalmometric reading within the upper normal limit of Caucasian measurements may consider advanced study to exclude TAO or other cause of exophthalmos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Migliori and Gladstone (1984) reported the upper limit value in normal patients to be 20.1 mm for white women, 21.7 mm for white men, 23.0 mm for black women, and 24.7 mm for black men. Other reported upper limits of normal adults are 17.7 mm for Japanese (Amino et al, 1980), 18.3 mm for Koreans (Kim & Choi, 2001), 18.6 mm for Chinese (Tsai et al, 2005), and 19.3 mm for Iranians (Kashkouli et al, 2003). Anthropological difference may account for the varying normal values since the shape of the bony orbit is thought to vary with race (Tsai et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Exophthalmometry has been studied in normal adults and children of various races and ethnic backgrounds (Amino et al, 1980;Bolanos Gil de Montes et al, 1999;Fledelius & Stubgaard, 1986;Kashkouli et al, 2003;Kim & Choi, 2001;Knudtzon, 1949;Kumari Sodhi et al, 2001;Migliori & Gladstone, 1984;Mourits et al, 2004;Nucci et al, 1989). Migliori and Gladstone (1984) reported the upper limit value in normal patients to be 20.1 mm for white women, 21.7 mm for white men, 23.0 mm for black women, and 24.7 mm for black men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…No entanto, esse limite varia conforme a população estudada: japoneses (17,7mm) (20) , coreanos (18,3mm) (7) , iranianos (19,3mm) (21) , e chineses (18,6mm) (15) . Observou-se neste estudo um limite superior de 20mm para os brancos e os pardos, e de 23mm para o grupo dos negros.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified