Heterogeneity introduced by EHR system implementation in a de-identified data resource from 100 non-affiliated organizations

Abstract

Objectives Electronic health record (EHR) data aggregated from multiple, non-affiliated, sources provide an important resource for biomedical research, including digital phenotyping. Unlike work with EHR data from a single organization, aggregate EHR data introduces a number of analysis challenges. Materials and Methods We used the Cerner Health Facts data, a de-identified aggregate EHR data resource populated by data from 100 independent health systems, to investigate the impact of EHR implementation factors on the aggregate data. These included use of ancillary modules, data continuity, International Classification of Disease (ICD) version and prompts for clinical documentation. Results and Discussion Health Facts includes six categories of data from ancillary modules. We found of the 664 facilities in Health Facts, 49 use all six categories while 88 facilities were not using any. We evaluated data contribution over time and found considerable variation at the health system and facility levels. We analyzed the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 and found that some organizations completed the shift in 2014 while others remained on ICD-9 in 2017, well after the 2015 deadline. We investigated the utilization of “discharge disposition” to document death and found inconsistent use of this field. We evaluated clinical events used to document travel status implemented in response to Ebola, height and smoking history. Smoking history documentation increased dramatically after Meaningful Use, but dropped in some organizations. These observations highlight the need for any research involving aggregate EHR data to consider implementation factors that contribute to variability in the data before attributing gaps to “missing data.”

A multicenter mixed-effects model for inference and prediction of 72-h return visits to the emergency department for adult patients with trauma-related diagnoses

“…The descriptive and predictive multicenter models developed in this study were built using a subset of data from the database based on a priori inclusion criteria. An extensive analysis of a prior version of the database has been conducted with recommendations on its use [25].…”

Healthcare System-to-System Cost Variability in the Care of Pediatric Abdominal Pain-Associated Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

“…A challenge inherent in this and all pediatric studies of chronic abdominal pain is the inconsistencies in diagnosing specific AP-FGIDs. The strength of the current study is that the database allowed for the description of costs across a large population drawn from multiple sites and across the continuum of care with wide geographic distribution [22,23]. Utilizing the Health Facts database allowed for evaluation across centers and across the continuum of care including outpatient, emergency department, and inpatients settings.…”

Use of large scale EHR data to evaluate A1c utilization among sickle cell disease patients

“…Additionally, as our analysis was focused on potential associations to the least and most adherent subcohort, we did not include the second and third quartile facilities (NA-1 nor NA-4) despite a significant number of patients. Another possible limitation is that some A1c tests may not be included in HF due to the absence of the Cerner laboratory module at some sites or the use of point-of-care A1c testing that does not populate the pathology database tables [ 40 ]. Also, the same concerns may apply to our observation of limited ordering of fructosamine and the absence of other alternative tests.…”