2019
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz036.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HGG-13. Determining Regional Differences in High-Grade Glioma Vasculature Phenotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their analysis found that H3-WT gliomas had a significant enrichment in endothelial gene signatures compared to H3-mutated pHGGs, suggesting increased vascularization of H3-WT tumors. This hypothesis is being investigated using mouse models of DIPG and pHGG [18]. They also found that tumors rich in antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells and helper T-cells, had a favorable prognosis if the tumor also contained cytolytic cells (CD8 T-cells and NK).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their analysis found that H3-WT gliomas had a significant enrichment in endothelial gene signatures compared to H3-mutated pHGGs, suggesting increased vascularization of H3-WT tumors. This hypothesis is being investigated using mouse models of DIPG and pHGG [18]. They also found that tumors rich in antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells and helper T-cells, had a favorable prognosis if the tumor also contained cytolytic cells (CD8 T-cells and NK).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that local neuroinflammation caused by infused CAR-T therapy was shown to be fatal in mouse models [23], indicating that caution must be used when attempting to stimulate cytokines in brainstem pHGGs. Another cogent hypothesis is that vascular differences exist between these tumor locations [17,18,24], preventing the influx of immune cells to the tumor site. Our data showing mast cell and eosinophil associations with tumors are surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%