HGKM: An Efficient Hybrid Group Key Management for Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles MBN in Wireless Network Environment

Abstract

Mobile ad hoc networks (MANET) have been seen as a related advancement to Group Key Management (GKM) applications. Remembering the true objective to guarantee amass applications and disallow uncertified clients from getting to the correspondence data that cannot be anchored by a remote MANET, including IP multicast, the singular gathered data content must remain encoded by a typical shared gathering key. Key administration is required to anchor the assurance of gathering the key and to safeguard those gathering data. GKM framework is associated with the remote system condition partners with three issues: execution, security, and system versatility. This article focuses on the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-mobile backbone node (MBN) remote system performance. The UAV-MBN Network condition is a military system that includes a proposal to group an important administrative structure. A half-and-half gathering key administration technique, which works on each target of UAV-MBN, is included in an arrangement to start two basic remote gathering key administration difficulties: (1) operational performance and (2) multiple-enrollment development. By working with minimal small-scale key administration, this strategy can diminish the execution cost associated with the key administration along with the increment operational execution of remote GKM. Scaled-down key organization is carried out in the context of these movement units. The key administration approach also restricted the operational procedure and decreased the operation’s cost in terms of key generation, figuring, and associated correspondence. Overall, the HGKM strategy that has been introduced enhances the operational process and functions effectively in reasonable remote areas.

Retracted: HGKM: An Efficient Hybrid Group Key Management for Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles MBN in Wireless Network Environment

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”