Hierarchical Attention Graph Embedding Networks for Binary Code Similarity against Compilation Diversity

Abstract

Binary code similarity comparison is the technique that determines if two functions are similar by only considering their compiled form, which has many applications, including clone detection, malware classification, and vulnerability discovery. However, it is challenging to design a robust code similarity comparison engine since different compilation settings that make logically similar assembly functions appear to be very different. Moreover, existing approaches suffer from high-performance overheads, lower robustness, or poor scalability. In this paper, a novel solution HBinSim is proposed by employing the multiview features of the function to address these challenges. It first extracts the syntactic and semantic features of each basic block by static analysis. HBinSim further analyzes the function and constructs a syntactic attribute control flow graph and a semantic attribute control flow graph for each function. Then, a hierarchical attention graph embedding network is designed for graph-structured data processing. The network model has a hierarchical structure that mirrors the hierarchical structure of the function. It has three levels of attention mechanisms applied at the instruction, basic block, and function level, enabling it to attend differentially to more and less critical content when constructing the function representation. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate its effectiveness and efficiency. The results show that our tool outperforms the state-of-the-art binary code similarity comparison tools by a large margin against compilation diversity clone searching. A real-world vulnerabilities search case further demonstrates the usefulness of our system.

Retracted: Hierarchical Attention Graph Embedding Networks for Binary Code Similarity against Compilation Diversity

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi, as publisher, following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process.…”