Traffic control policies aim at reducing the negative externalities that ever-growing demand is causing on transportation networks, such as congestion and pollutant emissions. To achieve these goals, strategies coordinating and aligning the effects of several individual traffic controllers have received increasing attention in research and development in the past decades. However, a considerable gap still exists between the desired and experienced performance of advanced dynamic traffic management systems, resulting in failure to completely prevent the increasing peak-hour congestion in main urban areas worldwide. In this work we contribute to assessing whether this gap might be tied to inefficient network design, rather than algorithmic prowess. Based upon our earlier work, we investigate whether a trend can be found between determining locations of controllers in a network following control theoretical insights, and try to confirm our earlier intuitions when dealing with dynamic traffic assignment, featuring accurate propagation and spillback dynamics. To achieve these goals, we extend an existing synthetic network generation tool to allow us to test this hypothesis on real-life-like road networks, and extend our previously developed algorithms for the controller location problems allowing for sufficient generalization. Test results are presented on a simpler deterministic scenario and on 240 randomly generated networks, showcasing that placing controllers following controllability-based principles is advantageous from the perspective of model-based dynamic traffic management applications.