2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
1,308
0
29

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,554 publications
(1,484 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
1,308
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the discriminant validity of the constructs is also presented in Table 2, where the square root of AVE (i.e., diagonal bolded figures) of all the variables is higher than the correlation between two variables, and thus, indicating the distinctiveness of each variable (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). However, since the dependent variable (performance) is reflective-reflective type of HCM, we employed repeated indicator approach, thereby repeating the seven valid indicators of both financial and non-financial lower order components (LOCs) on performance which is the higher order component (HOC) as suggested by the HCM extant literature (Afthanorhan, 2014;Becker, Klein, & Wetzels, 2012;Ringle, Sarstedt, & Straub, 2012). Although financial and non-financial LOCs appeared in the research model, but LCOs are not taken into cognizance in both measurement and structural equation model, and therefore HOC represents the HCM in the analysis ( Hair et al, 2014).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the discriminant validity of the constructs is also presented in Table 2, where the square root of AVE (i.e., diagonal bolded figures) of all the variables is higher than the correlation between two variables, and thus, indicating the distinctiveness of each variable (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). However, since the dependent variable (performance) is reflective-reflective type of HCM, we employed repeated indicator approach, thereby repeating the seven valid indicators of both financial and non-financial lower order components (LOCs) on performance which is the higher order component (HOC) as suggested by the HCM extant literature (Afthanorhan, 2014;Becker, Klein, & Wetzels, 2012;Ringle, Sarstedt, & Straub, 2012). Although financial and non-financial LOCs appeared in the research model, but LCOs are not taken into cognizance in both measurement and structural equation model, and therefore HOC represents the HCM in the analysis ( Hair et al, 2014).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach uses different methods for data collection, including literature review, interviews with experts, workshops and an online survey, to gather different views of the concept. Our study extends the extant literature by developing a higher order construct, taking into account the most recent insights in the academic literature about how to correctly specify higher order constructs, using a Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis (Becker et al 2012;Ringle et al 2012). …”
Section: G1mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The repeated indicator approach with mode B on the process harmonization construct and inner path weighting scheme is used to estimate the hierarchical latent variable model (Becker et al, 2012). This approach consists of using the indicators twice: (1) for the first-order constructs and (2) for the second-order construct (BPH).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Castellanos-Verdugo et al, 2009; Cohen and Olsen, 2013;Pavlatos, 2015). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 software was utilised to analyse the data (Ringle et al, 2008).Due to its popularity in research and ability to take the whole nomological network into account, the repeated indicator approach was employed to estimate the model (Becker et al, 2012; Hair et al, 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%