High inter‐rater reliability between physicians and nurses utilising modified Downes' scores in preterm respiratory distress

Abstract

AimTo assess the inter‐rater reliability of modified Downes' scores assigned by physicians and nurses in the Ethiopian Neonatal Network and to calculate the concordance of score‐based treatment for preterm infants with respiratory distress.MethodsWe included preterm infants admitted from June 2020 to July 2021 to four tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of the Ethiopian Neonatal Network that presented with respiratory distress. We calculated the kappa statistic to determine the nurse and physician correlation for each component of the modified Downes' score and total score on admission and evaluated the concordance of scores above and below the treatment threshold of 4.ResultsOf the 1151 eligible infants admitted, 817 infants (71%) had scores reported concurrently and independently by nurse and physician. The kappa statistic for modified Downes' score components ranged from 0.88 to 0.92 and was 0.89 for the total score. There was 98% concordance for score‐based treatment.ConclusionIncorporation of the modified Downes' score on admission for preterm infants with respiratory distress was feasible in tertiary NICUs in Ethiopia. The kappa statistics showed near‐perfect agreement between nurse and physician assessments, translating to a very high degree of concordance in score‐based treatment recommendations. These results highlight an opportunity for task‐shifting assessments and empowering nurses.