2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.22.432202
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-level representations in human occipito-temporal cortex are indexed by distal connectivity

Abstract: Human object recognition is dependent on occipito-temporal cortex, but a complete understanding of the complex functional architecture of this area must account for how it is connected to the wider brain. Converging functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence shows that univariate responses to different categories of information (e.g. faces, bodies, & non-human objects) are strongly related to, and potentially shaped by, functional and structural connectivity to the wider brain. However, to date, there … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this view, local representations do depend on local computations, feedforward and feedback connections, as described before, but also, and importantly, on connections from distal regions that share categorical preference (and that pertain to the same level of representation). That is, local representations are constrained by connectivity with other brain areas at the same level in the visual processing hierarchy (Almeida et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2017;Garcea et al, 2019;Hutchison et al, 2014;Hutchison & Gallivan, 2018;Lee et al, 2019;, 2011Walbrin & Almeida, 2021). In support of this view, representations in a tool-preferring region (the left medial fusiform gyrus; mFUG) within the ventral temporal cortex (VTC) are causally dependent on computations in remote but functionally connected tool-preferring regions within parietal cortex (the Inferior Parietal Lobule; IPL; Lee et al, 2019; see also Ruttorf et al, 2019;Garcea et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this view, local representations do depend on local computations, feedforward and feedback connections, as described before, but also, and importantly, on connections from distal regions that share categorical preference (and that pertain to the same level of representation). That is, local representations are constrained by connectivity with other brain areas at the same level in the visual processing hierarchy (Almeida et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2017;Garcea et al, 2019;Hutchison et al, 2014;Hutchison & Gallivan, 2018;Lee et al, 2019;, 2011Walbrin & Almeida, 2021). In support of this view, representations in a tool-preferring region (the left medial fusiform gyrus; mFUG) within the ventral temporal cortex (VTC) are causally dependent on computations in remote but functionally connected tool-preferring regions within parietal cortex (the Inferior Parietal Lobule; IPL; Lee et al, 2019; see also Ruttorf et al, 2019;Garcea et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%