2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High potency vaccines induce protection against heterologous challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
104
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a different approach to predict protection using in vitro analysis and specific antibody responses has also been described by Brehm et al [50]. Taking into consideration that we have vaccinated with SAT2 vaccines, the predicted protection of >85% is based on the comparison of the SAT2 heterologous titres in this study with the protective titres in the study of Brehm et al [50]. This also correlates with the predictions from Barnett et al [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a different approach to predict protection using in vitro analysis and specific antibody responses has also been described by Brehm et al [50]. Taking into consideration that we have vaccinated with SAT2 vaccines, the predicted protection of >85% is based on the comparison of the SAT2 heterologous titres in this study with the protective titres in the study of Brehm et al [50]. This also correlates with the predictions from Barnett et al [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…From previ-ous work predicting protection using in vitro analysis and specific antibody responses [49] we can anticipate that >88% of animals vac-cinated with either SAT2/ZIM/14/90 or vSAT2 ZIM14 -SAT2 vaccines would be protected against heterologous challenge with the viruses in this study. However, a different approach to predict protection using in vitro analysis and specific antibody responses has also been described by Brehm et al [50]. Taking into consideration that we have vaccinated with SAT2 vaccines, the predicted protection of >85% is based on the comparison of the SAT2 heterologous titres in this study with the protective titres in the study of Brehm et al [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antigenic analysis of field isolates in relation to vaccine strains, based on VNTs, play a significant role in evaluating the suitability of existing vaccine strains (Jangra et al, 2005;Paton et al, 2005;Brehm et al, 2008), despite significant variation having been reported with VNTs (Rweyemamu et al, 1978(Rweyemamu et al, , 1984. It is generally accepted that r 1 -values higher than 0.4 demonstrates a good cross-protection of the vaccine against the field isolate (Samuel et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the protective efficacy of FMD vaccine can be evaluated through vaccine matching using indirect serological methods (Rweyemamu 1984a;Rweyemamu 1984b) and it can also be calculated using the relatedness between the field isolate and available vaccine strains using in vivo challenge tests (Brehm et al, 2008;Goris et al, 2008). Selection of viruses for vaccine matching is very important and should be based on epidemiological information, including stages of an epidemic, geographical locations or range of host species (Alonso et al, 1993;Paton et al, 2005) by incorporating a minimum of two isolates from outbreak (OIE, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%