IUPAC Standards Online 2016
DOI: 10.1515/iupac.68.0196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Resolution Wavenumber Standards for the Infrared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the mid-infrared water studies predated the better accuracy calibration standards [89,90]. At longer wavelengths, adjustments were made to resolve inconsistencies noticed during the MARVEL analysis (see Table 4 of Part III).…”
Section: Levels and Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the mid-infrared water studies predated the better accuracy calibration standards [89,90]. At longer wavelengths, adjustments were made to resolve inconsistencies noticed during the MARVEL analysis (see Table 4 of Part III).…”
Section: Levels and Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is provided by the high-resolution spectroscopic data measured by Guelachvili for H 2 16 O, and a couple of its isotopologues, and reported in 1983 in the 1066−2296 cm −1 region. 106 These data were revised about a decade later, 107 when Guelachvili et al introduced a calibration factor of 0.99999977, improving substantially the accuracy of the measured lines. Although the deviation of this factor from 1.0 appears to be small, many FTS measurements have a relative accuracy considerably better than 10 −7 , under ideal conditions this can be 10 −9 −10 −10 .…”
Section: Marvelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the MARVEL process it became apparent that line positions from some specific studies had been calibrated with frequency standards that were less accurate (and in some cases inconsistent) than currently available information. Some of the mid-infrared water studies predated the better accuracy calibration standards [89,90]. At longer wavelengths, adjustments were made to resolve inconsistencies noticed during the MARVEL analysis (see Table 4 of Part III).…”
Section: Levels and Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%