2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1345067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High response rate and improvement of long-term survival with combined treatment modalities in patients with poor-risk primary thyroid diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group and Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asignificant limitation of our review is the inconsistency, due primarily to the subtypes of primary thyroid lymphoma, in the patient populations among the various studies. Very few of the studies we analyzed stratified outcomes by both histologic subtype and treatment modality [6,10,16,34] -a significant constraint, as different histologic subtypes may indicate different treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Asignificant limitation of our review is the inconsistency, due primarily to the subtypes of primary thyroid lymphoma, in the patient populations among the various studies. Very few of the studies we analyzed stratified outcomes by both histologic subtype and treatment modality [6,10,16,34] -a significant constraint, as different histologic subtypes may indicate different treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of our review is the prevailing lack of consensus regarding chemotherapeutic agents and radiation techniques. Most studies used CHOP or CHOP-like regimens, but outcomes may have been distorted by the addition of rituximab or bleomycin and by the use of other modalities such as CVP [1,10,16,26,29,33]. Radiation therapy also varied in terms of exposure fields, dosage, and frequency, possibly sullying interpretation of outcomes [1,6,10,16,26,29,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations