2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2013.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed scanning photocurrent imaging techniques on nanoscale devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carrier diffusion motions induced by a pump pulse located in the middle of the NWs were visualized; however, these optical measurements are limited for interrogating the carrier dynamics in operating devices because they strongly depend on the non-linear properties of materials and they are frequently obscured by the substrate signals. Consequently, these techniques are not ideal for low-dimensional systems with NWs thinner than the optical spot size (<100 nm) or with SWNTs.Scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) techniques have been introduced as powerful tools for investigating local optoelectronic characteristics, such as metallic contacts, defects, interfaces, and junctions [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . We were able to collect localized electronic band information that is not disturbed by signals originating from the substrate, and hence, compared with conventional optical pump-probe techniques, SPCM can provide a higher signal-to-noise ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The carrier diffusion motions induced by a pump pulse located in the middle of the NWs were visualized; however, these optical measurements are limited for interrogating the carrier dynamics in operating devices because they strongly depend on the non-linear properties of materials and they are frequently obscured by the substrate signals. Consequently, these techniques are not ideal for low-dimensional systems with NWs thinner than the optical spot size (<100 nm) or with SWNTs.Scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) techniques have been introduced as powerful tools for investigating local optoelectronic characteristics, such as metallic contacts, defects, interfaces, and junctions [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . We were able to collect localized electronic band information that is not disturbed by signals originating from the substrate, and hence, compared with conventional optical pump-probe techniques, SPCM can provide a higher signal-to-noise ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) techniques have been introduced as powerful tools for investigating local optoelectronic characteristics, such as metallic contacts, defects, interfaces, and junctions [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . We were able to collect localized electronic band information that is not disturbed by signals originating from the substrate, and hence, compared with conventional optical pump-probe techniques, SPCM can provide a higher signal-to-noise ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,11,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Since the SPCM signal originates from local electric fields, the position, intensity, and shape of the signals provide detailed information regarding the electric potential profiles of the devices, as has been discussed elsewhere. 11,12,25 Additionally, SPCM methods are based on optical probing techniques that can deliver optoelectronic information in a non-contact and non-destructive manner. Therefore, they can serve as a powerful tool for addressing the localized electronic states in SWNTs and NWs in aqueous environments without noticeably disturbing the device operation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this setup, the individual SWNT devices are illuminated using a diffraction-limited laser focal spot, while the electric current is recorded as a function of the laser spot position, as has been discussed previously. 12,26,27 To address the device operation in an aqueous environment, we used a water-immersion type objective lens (60Â, N.A 0.9), whereas for measurements in ambient conditions, we used a conventional objective lens (100Â, N.A 0.8). The focused laser was scanned using galvanometer scanning mirrors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As schematically shown in Fig. 1 , we scanned the focused UV laser (2.8 mW) over the samples, while simultaneously monitoring the photo-induced signals as a function of the laser’s position 26 29 . To address the device operation in an electrolyte environment, we used a water-immersion type objective lens (Supplementary Information S1 ) 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%