2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2022.101054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High strain rate nanoindentation testing: Recent advancements, challenges and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While machine-learning aided materials informatics promises to dramatically accelerate materials design and discovery ( 2 ), validating materials characterization and performance through standard high-strain-rate testing techniques, i.e., plate impact ( 3 ), split Hopkinson bar ( 4 6 ), and gas gun impact ( 7 ), still remains a bottleneck in the high-strain-rate materials design cycle due to the low throughput nature and high cost of these testing techniques. In this regard, high-strain-rate nanoindentation has recently emerged as a potentially useful high-throughput testing technique ( 8 ), but it remains unclear whether small-scale measurements adequately capture material deformation behavior at macroscopic scales ( 9 12 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While machine-learning aided materials informatics promises to dramatically accelerate materials design and discovery ( 2 ), validating materials characterization and performance through standard high-strain-rate testing techniques, i.e., plate impact ( 3 ), split Hopkinson bar ( 4 6 ), and gas gun impact ( 7 ), still remains a bottleneck in the high-strain-rate materials design cycle due to the low throughput nature and high cost of these testing techniques. In this regard, high-strain-rate nanoindentation has recently emerged as a potentially useful high-throughput testing technique ( 8 ), but it remains unclear whether small-scale measurements adequately capture material deformation behavior at macroscopic scales ( 9 12 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%