2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40192-016-0054-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High throughput exploration of process-property linkages in Al-6061 using instrumented spherical microindentation and microstructurally graded samples

Abstract: Recent spherical nanoindentation protocols have proven robust at capturing the local elastic-plastic response of polycrystalline metal samples at length scales much smaller than the grain size. In this work, we extend these protocols to length scales that include multiple grains to recover microindentation stress-strain curves. These new protocols are first established in this paper and then demonstrated for Al-6061 by comparing the measured indentation stress-strain curves with the corresponding measurements … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the average of multiple nanoindentation measurements made on randomly selected single grains or phases reasonably represents the bulk indentation strength (i.e., the bulk strength is a homogenized response of the constituents). Recent work has shown that the indentation yield strength using the protocols followed in this work is approximately 2 times higher than the uniaxial yield strength for isotropic materials [20,23]. The average indentation strength of the largest indenter size is approximately 1.9 times the reported tensile strength of 955 MPa for the same material [9], which is remarkably close given that the ratio is likely to be affected by the material anisotropy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, the average of multiple nanoindentation measurements made on randomly selected single grains or phases reasonably represents the bulk indentation strength (i.e., the bulk strength is a homogenized response of the constituents). Recent work has shown that the indentation yield strength using the protocols followed in this work is approximately 2 times higher than the uniaxial yield strength for isotropic materials [20,23]. The average indentation strength of the largest indenter size is approximately 1.9 times the reported tensile strength of 955 MPa for the same material [9], which is remarkably close given that the ratio is likely to be affected by the material anisotropy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The protocols described above have been extensively validated in prior work with different indenter sizes on a broad range of material systems [23,25,32,34]. The validation has included comparisons with properties measured using alternate protocols, extensive imaging of the indenter shape, and comparisons between measurements and predictions from finite element simulations.…”
Section: Indentation Stress-strain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main issues in this correlation are indeed related to the differences in the probe volumes and the inherent anisotropy of material response at the probed length scales. At this time, these correlations are most mature at the two ends of the spectrum of applications: (i) the indented volume is very large compared to the representative volume element of the material microstructure, and allows idealization of the material response in the indentation zone as a homogeneous isotropic medium [13,57] and (ii) the indented volume is a single phase crystalline region (e.g., a region within a grain in a single-phase polycrystalline sample) [7,13,32,58]. Clearly, the indentations in the sample studied here do not fall into either of these idealized conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%