2018
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.2.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher-Order-Aberrations Following Hyperopia Treatment: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction, Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Lenticule Implantation

Abstract: PurposeTo compare the postoperative higher-order-aberrations (HOAs) after hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and lenticule implantation for correction of hyperopia.MethodsEighteen monkeys were divided to six groups: +2.00 D and +4.00 D hyperopic SMILE, +2.00 D and +4.00 D hyperopic LASIK (n = 6 eyes for each), and lenticule implantation with a −2.00 D and −4.00 D lenticule (n = 3 eyes for each). The corneal HOAs were evaluated preoper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are, however, in agreement with previous studies of biological lenticule implantation ex vivo in human donor corneas and in vivo in non-human primates 47 , 48 . We observed an increase in the RMS of total HOA while the SA became more negative following biological implantation, consistent with previous reported higher-order aberrations after implantation of artificial 44 and biological inlays 49 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are, however, in agreement with previous studies of biological lenticule implantation ex vivo in human donor corneas and in vivo in non-human primates 47 , 48 . We observed an increase in the RMS of total HOA while the SA became more negative following biological implantation, consistent with previous reported higher-order aberrations after implantation of artificial 44 and biological inlays 49 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For correction of hyperopia, an important and attractive surgical correction is the transplantation of lenticules obtained from the SMILE procedure ( 55 ). Lenticule keratophakia and epikeratophakia are reversible in SMILE, and the visual quality offers unique advantages ( 56 , 57 ). Moreover, the discarded tissue was also reused as a bio-scaffold for stromal engineering, and an ocular drug delivery system of active molecules ( 58 , 59 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convincing data about the accuracy and stability for a long period of the refractive correction has been obtained using SMILE for myopia [ 14 – 17 ]. Several studies have showed that corneal small incision intrastromal lenticule inlay can be used to correct hyperopic eye with good safety, effectiveness and predictability [ 3 10 ]. Meanwhile new treatments for hyperopia are emerging [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies reported that the lenticule implantation was used for the hyperopic correction as implanting a crescentic convex-shaped lenticule obtained from a myopic SMILE procedure resulted in steeper central cornea [ 7 9 ]. Liu et al compared the postoperative higher-order-aberrations (HOAs) profiles after hyperopic SMILE, hyperopic LASIK, and lenticule implantation for correction of hyperopia, and found that lenticule implantation appeared to have less induction of HOAs in low hyperopia treatment [ 10 ]. However, to our knowledge, corneal small incision intrastromal lenticule inlay has not been explored in hyperopic eyes with astigmatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%