Higher-Order PLS-PM Approach for Different Types of Constructs

Abstract

Partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) has become very popular in recent years, for measuring concepts that depend on different aspects and that are based on different types of relationships. PLS-PM represents a useful tool to explore relationships and to analyze the influence of the different aspects on the complex phenomenon analyzed. In particular, the use of higher-order constructs has allowed researchers to extend the application of PLS-PM to more advanced and complex models. In this work, our attention is focused on higher-order constructs that include reflective or formative relationships. Even if the dispute between formative models and reflective models is not exactly recent, it is still alive in current literature, for the most part within the context of structural equation models. This paper focuses attention on theoretical and mathematical differences between formative and reflective measurement models within the context of the PLS-PM approach. A simulation study is proposed in order to show how these approaches fit well in different modeling situations. The approaches have been compared using empirical application in a sustainability context. The findings from the simulation and the empirical application can help researchers to estimate and to use the higher-order PLS-PM approach in reflective and formative type models.

Micro-learning Platforms Brand Awareness Using Socialmedia Marketing and Customer Brand Engagement

“…The first step followed in the embedded two-stage approach was checks for the measurement model of lower-order reflective constructs [131], for which Cronbach's Alpha, Composite reliability and the Convergent validity (AVE) were calculated. As can be seen in table 2, both Cronbach's Alpha and composite reliability values were above 0.7 [132], [133] while AVE values were above 0.5 [128], [134], [135]; therefore it can be stated that the lower-order reflective constructs comply with the internal consistency reliability, the composite reliability and the convergent validity.…”

Information and Communication Technology and Organizational Performance During Covid-19 Pandemic: The Role of Organizational Commitment, Growth Mindset, and Entrepreneurial Orientation

“…To assess whether measures of ICT adoption included the four-variable structure, we performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to check the validity of the measurement model for our research variables ( Marsh et al, 2020 ; Crocetta et al, 2021 ). We performed Chi-square difference tests sequentially to compare the quality indices of our five-factor model to other alternative models (i.e., four-factor, three-factor models, and two factors, respectively).…”

Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach

“…Therefore, a higher (or second)-order construct can be either constituted (formative) or represented (reflective) by its lower (or first)-order dimensions (constructs). Depending on these relations, when it comes to second-order models, four types of hierarchical latent variable models can be distinguished: reflective-reflective, reflective-formative, formative-reflective and formative-formative [20,21]. In the reflectivereflective type, relations between first-order constructs and their indicators, as well as relations between the second-order construct and its lower-order constructs are reflective.…”