2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24072-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Customizable Service Composition and Orchestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A correctness score has been given to each participant code. This has been calculated by assigning one point to each correct API and one point to the milestone code statement then the total was divided by the maximum ✔ x x Network level x Mokhtarpour et al [20] x x x N/A x Holonic system [16,18,24] ✔ x ✔ HTTP x HTTP-CoAP Proxy [6,7] x x x CoAP, REST ✔ Derhamy et al [10] x x x CoAP, HTTP, MQTT x XWARE [23] x x x N/A ✔ SemIoTic [31] x x ✔ CoAP, MQTT ✔ Hetero-Genius [this] ✔ ✔ ✔ CoAP, HTTP, MQTT ✔ number of points resulting is a score out of 100%. The correctness results obtained from applying both the classical approach and the Hetero-Genius approach are shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Correctness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A correctness score has been given to each participant code. This has been calculated by assigning one point to each correct API and one point to the milestone code statement then the total was divided by the maximum ✔ x x Network level x Mokhtarpour et al [20] x x x N/A x Holonic system [16,18,24] ✔ x ✔ HTTP x HTTP-CoAP Proxy [6,7] x x x CoAP, REST ✔ Derhamy et al [10] x x x CoAP, HTTP, MQTT x XWARE [23] x x x N/A ✔ SemIoTic [31] x x ✔ CoAP, MQTT ✔ Hetero-Genius [this] ✔ ✔ ✔ CoAP, HTTP, MQTT ✔ number of points resulting is a score out of 100%. The correctness results obtained from applying both the classical approach and the Hetero-Genius approach are shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Correctness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works have chosen to do this at design time through analyzing qualitative mission objectives of systems (e.g., [20]), but these are hard to express in a programmatic way that enables automated reasoning at runtime. Other works have also defined the notion of a holonic system [16,18,24], but are focused on goal-driven service composition without means of allowing holons to reason and self-compose. IoT interoperability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closest work to ours also defines the notion of a holon [19,31], but is focused on goal-driven service composition without means of allowing holons to reason and self-compose.…”
Section: Problem Space and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%