2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and plant regeneration system for genome engineering in tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, our initial attempts to regenerate alfalfa plant using the existing procedures (a number of published studies) did not succeed or only obtained several numbers of unhealthy regenerated plants (even no regenerated plants). We could understand that the poor repeatability is probably due to the differences of genotype/cultivar, explant type, or hormone ration compared to the previous studies (Rajesh et al 2016;Kumar et al 2017;Sandhya et al 2022). Again, unfortunately our request to obtain the original alfalfa material and the detailed transformation procedures from the researchers who have already published the study was declined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a matter of fact, our initial attempts to regenerate alfalfa plant using the existing procedures (a number of published studies) did not succeed or only obtained several numbers of unhealthy regenerated plants (even no regenerated plants). We could understand that the poor repeatability is probably due to the differences of genotype/cultivar, explant type, or hormone ration compared to the previous studies (Rajesh et al 2016;Kumar et al 2017;Sandhya et al 2022). Again, unfortunately our request to obtain the original alfalfa material and the detailed transformation procedures from the researchers who have already published the study was declined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Since Deak et al (1986) rstly reported the successful alfalfa transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, many researchers conducted studies on optimization of the alfalfa transformation conditions (i.e., suitable genotype and explant, hormone component and ratio) and improvement of transformation technologies (Koul et Sandhya et al 2022). Nevertheless, several of the procedures are characterized by a low transformation frequency or the procedures described vaguely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regenerating calli resulted in the formation of multiple shoots after 3 weeks on medium containing 3 mg/L BAP and 0.1 mg/L IAA. Furthermore, Sandhya et al (2012) reported that 2.0 mg/L ZT in combination with 0.1 mg/L IAA produced the highest number of shoots from the cotyledon explants of two different tomato cultivars, Arka Vikas and Pusa Early Dwarf [ 23 ]. Shorter explant-to-plantlet regeneration time is always desirable, as it reduces labor and resource costs and allows high-throughput approaches for early recovery and evaluation of transgenic lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a gap in the use of Agrobacterium -mediated transformation for the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 systems in plants that must be overcome, or some alternative methods need to be applied. Efforts have been made for the optimization of Agrobacterium -mediated transformation for GE of multiple plants, such as cotton, wheat, tomato, Maize, soybean, and rice [ 17 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. The Agrobacterium -mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 has been shifted to other field crops, such as Hemp [ 37 ].…”
Section: Ways To Deliver Crispr/cas Reagents To Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%