2003
DOI: 10.1021/bp025678s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Efficient “Tight Fit” Immobilization of α‐Chymotrypsin in Mesoporous MCM‐41: A Novel Approach Using Precursor Immobilization and Activation

Abstract: The zymogen alpha-chymotrypsinogen A is bound to mesoporous silica MCM-41 with a protein loading of 170 mg/g solid (MCM-Z) by a simple stirring in aqueous tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2). The bound zymogen is then activated with trypsin to obtain alpha-chymotrypsin immobilized on MCM-41 (MCM-E.I) that displays an effective enzyme activity corresponding to 65 mg protein/g of solid support (3250 BTEE units/g). A direct immobilization of commercially available alpha-chymotrypsin (MCM-E.II) gives lower loading (1250 BTEE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
25
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the pore size of mesoporous materials affects the adsorption behavior and leaching of enzymes (Diaz and Balkus, 1996;Takahashi et al, 2000Takahashi et al, , 2001Yiu et al, 2001;Fadnavis et al, 2003;Fan et al, 2003b;Jie et al, 2004, Vinu et al, 2004b. As explained above, larger enzymes than the pore size of mesopores cannot be adsorbed into mesoporous materials.…”
Section: Mesoporous Silicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the pore size of mesoporous materials affects the adsorption behavior and leaching of enzymes (Diaz and Balkus, 1996;Takahashi et al, 2000Takahashi et al, , 2001Yiu et al, 2001;Fadnavis et al, 2003;Fan et al, 2003b;Jie et al, 2004, Vinu et al, 2004b. As explained above, larger enzymes than the pore size of mesopores cannot be adsorbed into mesoporous materials.…”
Section: Mesoporous Silicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immobilization processes employing adsorption on porous glass beads (Marlot et al, 1985), ion exchange resins, alumina (Brady et al, 1986), silica (Brady et al, 1988), (bio) polymers (Gitlesen et al, 1997;Yasuda et al, 2002) have been applied to lipases. More recently, novel ordered mesoporous silicas have been investigated as potential hosts for lipase immobilization (Fadnavis et al, 2003;Takahashi et al, 2001;Thomas, 1999). Mesoporous materials are characterized by high specific surface areas (up to about 1500 m 2 /g) and pore volumes (up to about 1.5 cm 3 /g), making them ideal candidates as immobilization hosts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore dimension (7 nm) of the as‐synthesized SBA‐15 MSNs is sufficient for adsorbing a large variety of important biomolecules , . The narrow pore size distribution of the nanoparticles can also be favorable for adsorbing enzymes possessing a comparable size, as there appears to be evidence indicating that mesopores matching the size of encapsulated enzymes can enhance enzyme activity compared to hosts with pore sizes larger than the enzyme . In addition, 2D hexagonal pore systems confined in small particles result in short channel lengths, thus, facilitating mass transfer in the mesostructure that can be favorable for immobilizing and releasing proteins , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%