“…In the literature, although few modified electrodes showed low detection limits, their linear ranges were relatively narrow. For example, porphyrin‐functionalized graphene‐modified electrodes, gold@carbon dots‐chitosan modified electrodes, hollow nitrogen‐doped carbon microspheres modified electrodes, molecularly imprinted electropolymers/copper oxide nanoparticle‐modified electrodes, carbon‐functionalized metal organic framework/Nafion composites showed the lower detection limits of 0.01 × 10 −6 , 0.001 × 10 −6 , 0.02 × 10 −6 , 0.008 × 10 −6
, and 0.008 × 10 −6
m , respectively, toward the detection of DA, but their linear detection ranges were relatively narrow (0.01–70.0 × 10 −6 , 0.1–30 × 10 −6 , 5–70 × 10 −6 , 0.02–25 × 10 −6 , and 0.03–10 × 10 −6
m , respectively) 27. More importantly, the sensing performance of our MOF‐525–PEDOT NT sample was superior to several other carbon‐based materials, indicating that MOF–PEDOT nanocomposites are a good platform to expand the sensing capability to different analytes for electrochemical sensors.…”