2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hippocampal increased cell death and decreased cell density elicited by nicotine and/or ethanol during adolescence are reversed during drug withdrawal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed increases in cPLA 2 activity correspond with previous literature demonstrating increased cellular death [4] and decreased neurogenesis [5] following adolescent exposure to ethanol. Chronic ethanol is known to induce a multitude of pro-inflammatory markers and contribute to CNS degradation, particularly during critical periods of development such as adolescence [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observed increases in cPLA 2 activity correspond with previous literature demonstrating increased cellular death [4] and decreased neurogenesis [5] following adolescent exposure to ethanol. Chronic ethanol is known to induce a multitude of pro-inflammatory markers and contribute to CNS degradation, particularly during critical periods of development such as adolescence [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Interestingly, adolescents display differential behavioral responses following ethanol consumption compared to adults, such as reduced sensitivity to ethanol's sedative/hypnotic effects [3]. This is problematic, as decreased soporific sensitivity to ethanol likely lengthens consumption periods and further amplifies detrimental CNS effects, such as decreased neurogenesis and increased levels of cellular death [4, 5]. Thus, it is imperative to understand the molecular underpinnings underlying reduced ethanol-sensitivity during adolescence as they likely contribute to alcohol use disorders later in life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent in vivo study in adolescent mice showed that whereas exposure to either ethanol or nicotine resulted in reductions in hippocampal neuronal and glial cell densities concomitant administration of these two drugs reduced the adverse effects compared to each drug alone (Oliveira-da-Silva et al 2009). Moreover, the detrimental effects of all such treatments were abolished by prolonged withdrawal (Oliveira-da-Silva et al 2010). Thus, the in vivo dynamics of nicotinic receptor subtypes and their modulation by a number of endogenous factors including acetylcholine as well as the complexity of alcohol interactions with numerous receptors may yield a different outcome in whole animal compared to the in vitro setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue that remains to be fully addressed is the duration of these effects of nicotine on brain structure and whether or not they are fully reversed following withdrawal. A recent study in adolescent mice (P30-45) that were chronically exposed to nicotine in their drinking water suggests most observed effects were reversed by the time animals reached young adulthood (Oliveira-da-Silva et al, 2010). …”
Section: Psychostimulants and Adolescencementioning
confidence: 99%