2017
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2017.13987abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hiring post-incarceration: A comparison between retributive and rehabilitative contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ali et al, 2017;Rade et al, 2018) signals that additional guidance might be required to help develop new theory and research paradigms (Weick, 1989) (Figure 1). Calls for a systematic research agenda therefore are helpful for directing attention to the most pressing unanswered questions in the field, particularly those from important practitioner and academic concerns, such as: increasing public pressure to reduce recidivism through targeted interventions aimed at improving employability (Anazodo and Jones Young, 2017); and the assumed, but rarely tested, relationships between work outcomes, work experiences and criminal record.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali et al, 2017;Rade et al, 2018) signals that additional guidance might be required to help develop new theory and research paradigms (Weick, 1989) (Figure 1). Calls for a systematic research agenda therefore are helpful for directing attention to the most pressing unanswered questions in the field, particularly those from important practitioner and academic concerns, such as: increasing public pressure to reduce recidivism through targeted interventions aimed at improving employability (Anazodo and Jones Young, 2017); and the assumed, but rarely tested, relationships between work outcomes, work experiences and criminal record.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%