2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histogram analysis of quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI: Correlations with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in invasive ductal breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
34
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The R2* value was also closely related to histopathological prognostic factors in RC by T2*-weighted imaging (28), which was consistent with the present result. Previous results on the association between T2 value and prognosis factors in other diseases have been consistent (24,27,29). For example, Li et al (18) found that the accelerated T2 mapping sequence by SyMRI can facilitate grading and staging of cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The R2* value was also closely related to histopathological prognostic factors in RC by T2*-weighted imaging (28), which was consistent with the present result. Previous results on the association between T2 value and prognosis factors in other diseases have been consistent (24,27,29). For example, Li et al (18) found that the accelerated T2 mapping sequence by SyMRI can facilitate grading and staging of cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…T1, T2, and PD values reflect the intrinsic properties of tissues. The higher the cellularity is, the lower the extracellular space and free water content, thereby resulting in a reduction in the T1 and T2 values [ 37 ]. The 90th percentile, Median and Minimum represent the grey-level intensity within the VOIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative T1, T2, and PD Mean values were reported to be lower in malignant tumors vs. benign tumors [ 20 , 27 , 28 ], and in poor prognostic relevant factors tumors vs. good prognostic relevant factors [ 20 23 , 29 ]. Moreover, several histogram parameters, such as 10th Percentile, Kurtosis, Energy, Standard Deviation, and so on, were reported to predict tumor molecular subtypes [ 30 ] and lymph node metastasis (LNM) [ 31 ]. The research works [ 18 , 19 ] in breast cancer found changes in T1 during treatment and T2_Standard Deviation were useful to predict pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%