25th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference 1994
DOI: 10.2514/6.1994-2470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical perspective on the integration of testing and evaluation methodologies at the Arnold Engineering Development Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each stage of the Runge-Kutta integration, Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions are applied either directly using the procedure developed by Carpenter et al [43] (i.e., for Dirichlet data) or by using the penalty formulation [44] that will modify Eq. (11) on the boundary (i.e., for Dirichlet and/or Neumann data). The magnitudes of the wavelet coefficients at the new time will determine if the grid prediction must be corrected.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At each stage of the Runge-Kutta integration, Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions are applied either directly using the procedure developed by Carpenter et al [43] (i.e., for Dirichlet data) or by using the penalty formulation [44] that will modify Eq. (11) on the boundary (i.e., for Dirichlet and/or Neumann data). The magnitudes of the wavelet coefficients at the new time will determine if the grid prediction must be corrected.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several novel numerical methods have been developed to address this computational challenge. For example, adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) [6,7], multigrid methods [8,9,10], Chimera overset grids [11], and remeshing/refining finite element methods (FEM) [12,13,14,15] have been used to accomplish a great deal of contemporary computational modeling. However all of these methods become computationally expensive when the user does not know a priori the spatial and temporal locations of interesting solution features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%