2020
DOI: 10.1070/qel17288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holographic wavefront sensors

Abstract: A brief historical review of the first designs of holographic wavefront sensors (WFS’s) and the concepts lying in their basis is presented. The main directions in the development of these sensors are highlighted and considered. One of these directions implies a two-stage transition from the use of several separate measuring channels with holograms filtering only one Zernike mode: first to the use of one channel with a multiplexed hologram filtering several first Zernike modes, and then to filtering the entire … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheme of this experimental setup is shown in Figure 2. The experimental setup comprised a coherent optical radiation light source (1) (He-Ne laser, wavelength 0.63 microns), an optical device (2) (optical elements-lenses), a reflector (3) (a simulator of control object surface, an optical mirror with external surface coating), a beam-splitter (4) (a holographic diffraction grating similar to the one used in [33]), a reflector (5) (an optical mirror with external surface coating), a screen (6) (frosted glass), a device for recording the interference pattern (7) (a digital camera, 24 Mpks) and a device (8) for processing the results of the measurements (PC).…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Setup And Methods Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scheme of this experimental setup is shown in Figure 2. The experimental setup comprised a coherent optical radiation light source (1) (He-Ne laser, wavelength 0.63 microns), an optical device (2) (optical elements-lenses), a reflector (3) (a simulator of control object surface, an optical mirror with external surface coating), a beam-splitter (4) (a holographic diffraction grating similar to the one used in [33]), a reflector (5) (an optical mirror with external surface coating), a screen (6) (frosted glass), a device for recording the interference pattern (7) (a digital camera, 24 Mpks) and a device (8) for processing the results of the measurements (PC).…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Setup And Methods Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many types of wavefront transducers [8] and interferometers; among them, the Fizeau and Twyman-Green configurations should be highlighted. A perfect interferometer must create the image of a 3D optical surface without distortion irrespective of the surface type (flat, spherical or aspherical).…”
Section: Introduction and Purpose Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, wavefront sensors (WFS) are widely used to solve a multitude problems in various fields of physics, namely to control the shape of a wavefront or detect aberrations of the complex field amplitude [ 1 ]. These devices include the well-known Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor [ 2 , 3 ], curvature sensors [ 4 ], pyramidal sensors [ 5 , 6 ], and holographic WFSs [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The principle of the first three sensors is based on analyzing the intensity distribution of an image or set of images using a 2D image sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When characterizing conditionally static wave fields of light beams, their complex amplitude is usually represented in the form of two related components-amplitude (intensity) and phase distributions. A reliable estimation of the phase component of the field, often referred to as wavefront reconstruction [1][2][3] or a measurement of its aberrations [4,5], is usually the most difficult procedure. This is because one has to face problems of a possible ambiguity of the phase reconstruction [6], the presence of singular regions [7], a search for optimal boundary conditions [8] and limitations on the admissible dynamic range of phase gradients [9], which is typical for a particular measuring instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%