2007
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/02/086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holography, Padé approximants and deconstruction

Abstract: We investigate the relation between holographic calculations in 5D and the Migdal approach to correlation functions in large-N c theories. The latter employs Padé approximation to extrapolate short-distance correlation functions to large distances. We make the Migdal/5D relation more precise by quantifying the correspondence between Padé approximation and the background and boundary conditions in 5D. We also establish a connection between the Migdal approach and the models of deconstructed dimensions. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was explicitly shown in the first global SMEFT analysis of LEP and other precision electroweak observables, assuming a U (3) 5 -invariant structure [455]. This analysis was recently extended to the flavor-general case [456][457][458].…”
Section: Lep and Other Electroweak Precision Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This was explicitly shown in the first global SMEFT analysis of LEP and other precision electroweak observables, assuming a U (3) 5 -invariant structure [455]. This analysis was recently extended to the flavor-general case [456][457][458].…”
Section: Lep and Other Electroweak Precision Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We say that the Padé point is s = 0. The Padé approximants of Stieltjes functions can be written in terms of orthogonal polynomials (see [14] for a concise derivation and definitions):…”
Section: Padé Approximants Of Unparticle Propagatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the third property is less straightforward and we do not give it here, but refer again the interested reader to Ref. [14].…”
Section: Unparticle Vs Particle Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after the discussion of the last section, this statement cannot be right, as first pointed out in [7]. The reasons why both approaches yield the same results have been discussed in detail in [19]. Roughly speaking, it has to be attributed to three common ingredients, which are implemented in very different ways:…”
Section: Padé Approximants and The Gauge/string Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%