2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holonomic gradient descent and its application to the Fisher–Bingham integral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal likelihood value rescaled by −n as defined in (16) is 2.457746 = log 11.67846 which is same as the value reported in Nakayama et al (2011). The corresponding quantity for the saddlepoint approximation is 2.463414.…”
Section: Astronomy Datasupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal likelihood value rescaled by −n as defined in (16) is 2.457746 = log 11.67846 which is same as the value reported in Nakayama et al (2011). The corresponding quantity for the saddlepoint approximation is 2.463414.…”
Section: Astronomy Datasupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In Nakayama et al (2011), the authors illustrate the general methodology of holonomic gradient method by focusing on two data sets: one from the area of astronomy and the other one from the magnetism. We revisit the first data set in order to confirm that our method gives the same MLE results.…”
Section: Numerical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several applications for Gröbner bases in R. To illustrate, in this section we present an application of approximating a local minimum of a holonomic function g. This is a new method that was introduced in [21] to solve problems in statistics.…”
Section: Gradient Descent For Holonomic Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that an application of the Fisher-Bingham distribution on a sphere is discussed in [21] and subsequent papers (e.g., [17]). It is no longer of only theoretical interest.…”
Section: Finding a Local Minimum Of A Function Defined By A Definite mentioning
confidence: 99%