2019
DOI: 10.20870/productions-animales.2018.31.4.2394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holstein ou Montbéliarde : des différences phénotypiques aux conséquences économiques à l’échelle de l’exploitation

Abstract: Dans un contexte économique instable et difficile, les choix tels que la race utilisée dans les exploitations bovines laitières peuvent être remis en cause. Cet article présente au travers de deux études, l’analyse des différences phénotypiques de vaches de race Montbéliarde (Mo) et Holstein (Ho) et leur intégration au sein d’un modèle bioéconomique. Placées dans des conditions d’élevage équivalentes, les vaches de race Mo produisent environ 12% de lait en moins que celles de race Ho, avec des taux butyreux et… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, the lower milk fat content in Va milk compared to Mo is typical of Va breed (39,40), as this dual-purpose breed is not specifically selected for a high milk fat content. The lower fat content of Ho compared to Mo is in accordance with previous results comparing Ho and Mo reared in the same conditions (41). The lower fat and protein yields of Ho compared to Mo could be due to the lower adaptability of Ho breed to cover their high requirements without concentrate supplements, resulting in a negative energy balance, and lower fat and protein yield (24).…”
Section: Differences Among Breeds In Milk Fa Profilesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Briefly, the lower milk fat content in Va milk compared to Mo is typical of Va breed (39,40), as this dual-purpose breed is not specifically selected for a high milk fat content. The lower fat content of Ho compared to Mo is in accordance with previous results comparing Ho and Mo reared in the same conditions (41). The lower fat and protein yields of Ho compared to Mo could be due to the lower adaptability of Ho breed to cover their high requirements without concentrate supplements, resulting in a negative energy balance, and lower fat and protein yield (24).…”
Section: Differences Among Breeds In Milk Fa Profilesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the expected direct heterosis for CD is −10 to 15% and for SB is −5 to 10% (Sørensen et al, 2008), the HO calves did not differ from the crossbred calves for CD and SB. Balandraud et al (2018) also reported similar CD rates for HO (5.9%) and MO (6.3%) primiparous cows. The results of the current study were similar to Heins et al (2010), who reported no difference for SB for HO and MO calves (4.1 vs. 4.3%, respectively) from multiparous HO cows.…”
Section: Holstein Versus Mvh At St Paul and Morrissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The 3-breed crossbreds had numerically higher percentages of fat (+0.12% to +0.20%) and protein (+0.19% to +0.22%) than their HO herdmates during their first 3 lactations. A recent study in France (Balandraud et al, 2019) reported MO cows had higher fat percentage (+0.11%) and protein percentage (+0.13%) than HO cows in silage-fed herds. Our results were similar to those reported by Malchiodi et al (2011), who found MO × VR/HO crossbreds produced −3% lower fat plus protein production (kg) than their HO herdmates during first and second lacta- tion.…”
Section: -Breed Crossbreds and Ho Herdmatesmentioning
confidence: 90%