“…The number of criteria met varied across the reviews, with the minimum being 5 out of 11 [ 60 ] and the maximum being 11 out of 11 [ 57 , 64 , 66 , 68 ]. Among the assessed reviews, one scoping review was determined to be of low quality [ 60 ], nine were categorised as moderate quality [ 13 , 27 , 34 – 36 , 58 , 73 , 74 , 77 ], and the remaining 27 were deemed high quality [ 7 , 15 , 29 – 33 , 39 , 43 , 55 – 57 , 59 , 61 – 69 , 71 , 72 , 75 , 76 , 78 – 80 ]. Notably, all reviews met criteria 8 and 11, which pertain to the appropriate methods used to combine studies and the recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data.…”