Hostile attributional bias in severe alcohol use disorder

Pabst, Arthur; Peyroux, Élodie; Rolland, Benjamin; Timary, Philippe de; Maurage, Pierre

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.031

Cited by 25 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding is congruent with the results of the meta-analysis conducted by Hakulinen et al [ 12 ], which found that the domain “neuroticism” is associated primarily with people who engage in heavy alcohol consumption. It is also compatible with studies suggesting that people with AUD have biases toward recognizing and attributing hostile expressions and behaviors [ 50 , 51 ]. Thus, one hypothesis to explain this relationship could be that the occurrence of “withdrawal” exacerbates the “hostility” trait.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Bridge Nodes between Personality Traits and Alcohol-Use Disorder Criteria: The Relevance of Externalizing Traits of Risk Taking, Callousness, and Irresponsibility

Rosa-Cáceres

Narvaez-Camargo

Molina

et al. 2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Personality disorders show strong comorbidities with alcohol-use disorder (AUD), and several personality traits have been found to be more frequent in people with AUD. This study analyzes which personality facets of those proposed in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) of DSM-5 are associated with the diagnostic criteria of AUD. Methods: The sample was composed of 742 participants randomly selected from the Spanish population, and 243 patients attending mental health services. All participants were of legal age and signed an informed consent form. The instruments were administered to the community sample in an online format, and a psychologist conducted individual face-to-face interviews with the patients. AMPD facets were assessed through the Personality Inventory of DSM-5 Short-Form, and the AUD criteria through the Substance Dependence Severity Scale. A network analysis was applied to identify the personality facets mostly associated with the AUD criteria. Results: The network analysis showed the existence of three communities, grouping the AUD criteria, externalizing spectrum facets, and internalizing spectrum facets, respectively. Risk taking, callousness, and irresponsibility facets showed the strongest association with the AUD criteria, bridging externalizing personality traits with AUD criteria. Conclusions: The facets of risk taking, callousness, and irresponsibility should be accurately assessed in patients with AUD to differentiate between a possible primary personality disorder and a syndrome induced by alcohol addiction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Bridge Nodes between Personality Traits and Alcohol-Use Disorder Criteria: The Relevance of Externalizing Traits of Risk Taking, Callousness, and Irresponsibility

Rosa-Cáceres

Narvaez-Camargo

Molina

et al. 2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Explaining this nding, we can point out that hostile attribution bias plays an important role in the processing of various information. When information is ambiguous, the intent of others is Hostile attribution bias, which not only can lead to negative emotional reactions, but also facilitates negative emotions in ambiguous situations of hostile attribution and retrieving aggressive responses (19,20). On the other hand, it is di cult to effectively regulate emotions, social adjustment and mental health (53).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aggressive people tend to describe the motives of others as vague and provocative rather than harmful or accidental. This tendency is called hostile attribution bias (19,20). Identifying and recognizing negative situations and correctly assessing the intentions of individuals play a decisive role (21) that indirect biases against the existence of such siding reduce the social performance of adolescents (19) This bias is more used in the period of adolescent development (16).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia with Hostile attribution bias and Anger in in adolescent boys with high bullying: A Path Analysis

afrashteh

hanifeh

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Adolescence is one of the critical stages and the period of evolution of human physical and mental development that occurs between childhood and youth. Successful completion of this course plays a role in mental health and personality. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia with Hostile attribution bias and Anger in adolescent boys with bullying, which plays an important role in developmental outcomes in adolescents. Methods: This research was conducted by cross-sectional method. 345 adolescent boys with high bullying living in Zanjan, Iran participated in the study. To measure self-reporting tools, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Questionnaire of Hostile attribution bias and State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory tools were used to collect data. Path analysis method was used to analyze the causal model. The results show a good fit of the model with the experimental data. Results: The results also showed a direct and significant effect between anger with Difficulty in Emotion Regulation (β =0.19, p <0.05), with Alexithymia (β = 0.17, p <0.05) and with Hostile attribution bias (β =0.32, p<0.05) in male adolescents high bullying. As well the mediating role of Hostile attribution bias in the relationship between Difficulties in emotion regulation with anger is significant (β = 0.32). Moreover the mediating role of Hostile attribution bias in the relationship between Alexithymia with anger is significant (β = 0.20). Conclusion: These results contribute to the theoretical knowledge of how Alexithymia and hostile attribution bias affect anger in adolescent populations. The findings supported the mediating role of hostile attribution bias in the relationship between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia with anger in adolescents. All three predictor variables are trainable and can be used in anger reduction and bullying interventions in adolescents.

show abstract

“…Aggressive people tend to describe the motives of others as vague and provocative rather than harmful or accidental. This tendency is called hostile attribution bias (19,20). Identifying and recognizing negative situations and correctly assessing the intentions of individuals play a decisive role(21) that indirect biases against the existence of such siding reduce the social performance of adolescents (19) This bias is more used in the period of adolescent development (16).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia With Hostile Attribution Bias and Anger in in Adolescent Boys With High Bullying: a Path Analysis

afrashteh

hanifeh

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionAdolescence is one of the critical stages and the period of evolution of human physical and mental development that occurs between childhood and youth. Successful completion of this course plays a role in mental health and personality. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia with Hostile attribution bias and Anger in adolescent boys with bullying, which plays an important role in developmental outcomes in adolescents. Methods345 male students in Zanjan, iran participated in this study.To measure self-reporting tools, Gertz and Roemer(2004) Difficulty in emotion regulation Questionnaire, Toronto Alexithymia Questionnaire(TAS-20), McBril, Milich & Handley (2003 hostile attribution bias Questionnaire, and Eiseng and Glenn Wilson (2003) Aggression Questionnaire(2009) were evaluated. Path analysis method was used to analyze the causal model. The results show a good fit of the model with the experimental data. ResultsThe results also showed a direct and significant effect between anger and Difficulty in Emotion Regulation (β =0.19, p <0.05), Alexithymia (β = 0.17, p <0.05) and Hostile attribution bias in male adolescents (β =0.32, p<0.05) with high bullying. As well the mediating role of Hostile attribution bias in the relationship between Difficulties in emotion regulation with anger is significant (β = 0.32). Moreover the mediating role of Hostile attribution bias in the relationship between Alexithymia with anger is significant (β = 0.20). ConclusionThese results contribute to the theoretical knowledge of how Alexithymia and hostile attribution bias affect anger in adolescent populations. The findings supported the mediating role of hostile attribution bias in the relationship between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia with anger in adolescents. All three predictor variables are trainable and can be used in anger reduction and bullying interventions in adolescents.

show abstract

Hostile attributional bias in severe alcohol use disorder

Cited by 25 publications

References 34 publications

Bridge Nodes between Personality Traits and Alcohol-Use Disorder Criteria: The Relevance of Externalizing Traits of Risk Taking, Callousness, and Irresponsibility

Bridge Nodes between Personality Traits and Alcohol-Use Disorder Criteria: The Relevance of Externalizing Traits of Risk Taking, Callousness, and Irresponsibility

The Relationship between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia with Hostile attribution bias and Anger in in adolescent boys with high bullying: A Path Analysis

The Relationship Between Difficulty in Emotion Regulation and Alexithymia With Hostile Attribution Bias and Anger in in Adolescent Boys With High Bullying: a Path Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About