Hot Foam and Nitrogen Application to Promote Spring Transition of “Diamond” Zoysiagrass (Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr.) Overseeded with Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)

Abstract

In transition areas, cool season turfgrasses are overseeded in autumn to maintain the high quality of dormant warm season turfgrasses, while in spring several agronomic methods (scalping, coring, topdressing, verticutting, irrigation, and targeted fertilization) or chemical desiccation are adopted to remove the cool season turfgrasses from the stand. To reduce chemical applications, several methods of “thermal weeding” have been experimented with, but little is known about these methods in zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp. Willd) spring transition. A study was conducted at the University of Pisa, Italy, on Manila grass (Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr., cv “Diamond”) (Zm) overseeded with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) (Lp) with the aim of comparing different methods of cool season grass suppression (scalping and hot foam) and different application rates of nitrogen. To assess treatment effect, green cover, turf quality, turf color, shoot density, and some vegetation indices (GLI, DGCI and NDVI) were determined. An average green cover of at least 90% was obtained on all plots seven weeks after the treatments. While scalping had minor effects on turf appearance and on polystand composition, hot foam had a stronger effect on turf color, green cover, and turf quality in the weeks following application. Once it had recovered from the hot foam treatments, the turf had a greater number of Zm shoots and a relevant reduction of Lp shoots. The hot foam was very effective in suppressing Lp while maintaining Zm recovery capacity.

Using Sewage Sludge as Alternative Fertilizer: Effects on Turf Performance of Perennial Ryegrass

“…Turfgrass quality was rated visually via a 1 to 9 scale (1 = dead turf, poorest, 6 = minimally acceptable, light green, thin, and 9 = dark green, dense, and uniform turf) as used in the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) based on a combination of turfgrass uniformity, density, texture, and color. Turfgrass color rating was carried out visually using a 1 to 9 scale (1 = completely yellow, 6 = minimally acceptable, and 9 = dark green) [29][30][31][32]. Color and quality observations were taken monthly for two years.…”