Housing prices and inter-urban migration

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Understanding the causes and consequences of human migration has long been of interest to urban and regional economists. Empirical studies build on the theoretical results of Roback (1982) and Mueser and Graves (1995) by estimating the effects of wages, housing prices, and amenities on inter-area migration. Findings with respect to amenities are clear (e.g., Rappaport 2007), and household-level studies consistently find that relative wages or incomes increase the probability that a household will select a given location (e.g., Berger and Blomquist 1992). In contrast, the results for housing prices are inconclusive. Studies that include area-level measures (e.g., median housing price for a metropolitan area) find a mix of negative, positive, and insignificant effects on inter-area migration decisions (e.g., Hunt and Mueller 2004). Many migration studies exclude housing price measures. Terms of use: Documents inThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of housing prices in influencing inter-urban household migration decisions. An important contribution of the study is the development of a new method for representing housing prices in migration analyses. Following the approach commonly used to model wages in studies of household migration, we identify the form of the utility function for which individual-specific housing prices can be predicted for unselected areas as a function of individual characteristics. Our theoretical results guide the development of an empirical measure of housing costs that accounts for the decision to own or rent and the cost of holding housing capital.We test our housing cost measure using the 2000 PUMS to identify point-to-point migration decisions for a large sample of college-educated males residing in 291 U.S. metropolitan areas. We estimate conditional logit models of metropolitan area choice, controlling for wages, a large range of amenities, and expected housing costs. Our key finding is that our proposed housing cost measure yields the expected results (higher housing prices reduce the probability that an area is selected), which is robust to alternative specifications and samples. We re-estimate our model using three alternative metropolitan area measures of housing costs: median house price, average apartment rent, and average urban land rent. We find that these measures consistently yield counterintuitive results. 3 Housing Prices and Inter-urban Migration

Housing Price Differences Under the Development of New Towns: Using Taiwan as an Example

“…Consequently, the housing prices rise. This finding is consistent with that of Plantinga et al (2013). In other words, differences between the housing prices in areas inhabited by new and usual residents are determined by the population growth rate of the respective areas.…”

“…Furthermore, the housing prices in areas inhabited by new residents are significantly higher than those in areas inhabited by usual residents (H2). We infer that the key factor is population growth and this inference accords with the principle that population growth induces housing demands (Plantinga et al, 2013;Titman et al, 2014). Moreover, the housing prices in areas neighboring highways are significantly higher than those in areas near railway stations (H3).…”

“…Over a span of 12 years, the populations of the TUSD and Old Sanxiz in 2016 increased by 400% and 5% to approximately 50,000 and 83,000, respectively, indicating that the TUSD demonstrates a population growth rate 80 times that of Old Sanxia. Plantinga et al (2013) assert that urban differences affect people's willingness to move. In addition, potential housing demand is affected by migration.…”

Migración interna y tamaño de localidad en México

“…Las amenidades refuerzan la atractividad de las ciudades de menor tamaño con respecto a las deseconomías de aglomeración que exhiben las grandes metrópolis (Plantinga et al, 2013). Existen también estrategias de negociación familiar en relación con la inserción de la mujer en el mercado de trabajo.…”

Spatial variation of in-migration to Moscow: Testing the effect of housing market

“…Generally, higher housing costs reduce the likelihood that a particular location within a city is selected (Plantinga, Détang-Dessendre, Hunt, & Piguet, 2013). However, housing prices in Moscow have limited association with in-migration intensities, i.e.…”