1979
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(79)90612-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are absolute rutherford backscattering yields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-section for backscattering of 4 He from Au at 165 • . Universal: Universal potential from [28]; Andersen: Screening function from [27]; L'Ecuyer: Screening function from [26]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cross-section for backscattering of 4 He from Au at 165 • . Universal: Universal potential from [28]; Andersen: Screening function from [27]; L'Ecuyer: Screening function from [26]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if the deviation from the Rutherford cross-section is below about 20%. Often applied screening corrections are from L'Ecuyer [26] and Andersen [27]. These screening corrections are especially used by analytical simulation codes presented in section 3.3 and in [1].…”
Section: Cross-section Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this iterative procedure the depth profile calculation is started by assuming a homogeneous sample composition obtained by correcting the total yield of each element with the corresponding scattering cross section (screening corrections by Andersen [9] or L'Ecuyer [10] can be selected). Stopping forces for each recoil ion are then calculated for this initial sample composition, and the original depth for each detected recoiled or scattered particle is calculated backwards using the detected energy, stopping forces, and the known measurement geometry.…”
Section: Depth Profile Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the Rutherford model is, however, restricted to an energy window for a given projectile, target and scattering geometry. The low energy limit is set by electronic screening and is usually treated in simulations as a few percent correction 116 The internal representations of the models and/or databases, and the algorithms for implementation, differ from code to code. These differences are likely to produce additional deviations in simulation results beyond those attributable to the input data or models.…”
Section: Fundamental Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%